Should Sock Accounts be Allowed?

It's time to move on just after you've had your say? Weird that. For the record I would have been angry about the doxxing if it had been Ginger Piskie or yourself. It was a step too far regardless. And i very much refute the assertion that HIAG brought it on himself. There are some miserable ****ers on here who never got his humour. To those of us that get his humour it has always been clearly a pisstake that I've enjoyed. Others don't, that's life. There's a lot of rewriting history which while not condoning it attempts to explain what was done. For the record i dont buy that.

 

For enough ... and of course you are a Spurs fan ... no doubt with some of the same feelings towards the fans of the clubs (same posters even) that HIAG has had his issues with.

But reality hasn't been altered.

The poster who actually posted the info was banned - so why should others now be banned for sharing personal information on the open forum?

Also, HIAG's computer was not hacked. This wasn't 'private information' even though it was personal. It was publicly available to every fooker in the world because HIAG made it so ... as I've said, his biggest problem now is that he got outmanoevred by those he had most targeted and the forum knows it. Ego has taken a bit of a kicking.

Time to take it on the chin, tighten internet security ... and move on ... a salutary less for all... but mostly for HIAG.

 

Would this justice involve Piskie & Moi?

 

please log in to view this image

 

I dont agree with it to be honest, I wouldnt want it done to me.
But I admit looking at the facebook page out of curiosity if nothing else.
I think the reason HIAG is mad is exactly as Fosse stated, his ego has taken a kicking, BUT that doesn't make it any less wrong.

HIAG will need to move on and realise that the people he wants banned, will not be banned, he will just need to deal with it. No crime took place, the information linked here was not private information, it was personal information, but it was also information that anybody with a facebook account could obtain with ease.
I think if the perpetrators have been asked not to link any of that **** on here, and provided they do not do so, then we should just all forget about it and move on.

Also may I say what a genius troll move from brb by appointing DMD as PL mod Talk about putting the cat amongst the pigeons, now THAT is a Wum master

 

I have to agree it is a slick move and seems designed to piss people off. Is that the best option? Probably not as it will not chill things on here but perhaps deep down brb doesn't want it to chill.

 

Just let the people it involved decide when they want to move on, not when you decide Bope

 

Here we go with the "Wee Wee face". Lets HIAG speak for himself ffs.

Kind of goes without saying that HIAG is gonna whine about this for years to come regardless of what anyone says, just thought I would try to help him see that it will do no good.
He knows what the supermods are like on here, in fact his whining about it constantly is probably less likely to result in punishments for Piskie and Ginge!
Am I wrong? you know what brb is like

 

In reality he hasn't moved on in seven years after being banned from the Chelsea & Arsenal boards so the chances of him ever getting over this humiliation is liken to Elvis Presley riding Shergar in next years Derby.

 

Here we go with the 'i know best, im Bope'. None of that says to me that Hiag should shut up....so basically you are saying let's adapt to Brb's ****ishness...I'd rather just be a **** to him than to shove my tongue up his arse just because he's a mod.

If Hiag wants to drop it on here everyday then so be it...I understand. If a mod did **** all about something like that for me...I'd ruin this site within a week..you'd be carrying Brb's hammer for him because he would be busy to ****...good job it wasn't me.

 

Quite possibly but who am I to say 'move on' to him

 

brb is not being a ****, he just has little tolerance for ******s and snowflakes.

 

The very person he had accused helped him with his internet security by bringing it to his attention and instructing him of the flaws. Now I call that a magnaminous gesture on my part wouldn't you say? But Les being true to himself couldn't find the humility within himself to thank me for it. This guy will go to the grave holding a grudge.

 

Nonsense, he gets wound up with anyone who disagrees with him.

 

... think about what you are saying.

Did either Piskie or Ginger publish HIAG's (already publcly available) personal information on the open forum? No ... more likely it was Sucky because he had stated that he was going to do it in advance ... so why the fcuk should either Ginger or Piskie be banned? For visiting HIAG's public Facebook page and finding the truth that would crush them to be anything but and, instead, pretty funny - given the spin HIAG had put on his real world existence?

Have a word with yourself .. what should brb do? .. tell the boys to be more sensitive around poor HIAG? ...ban them for laughing at that crushing truth?

 

I'm not saying who should be banned. I reckon ultimately it was Brb from what I hear. However my point is it was Hiag who felt violated so I'll let him decide when he's done with it, not me.

 

You might not be ... but he certainly is ... true to form of his many years on here ...but;

Who put the information on the Facebook page and made it publicly available? Any 'violation' was ultimately facilitated by HIAG himself ... and the only real violation was to his 'HIAG' persona ... exposed as hugely Walter Mittyesque ... which many had already surmised anyway.

... . he should stop crying and move on ffs ... as you would likely be telling anyone else but him to do in similar circumstances

 

I have heard from reliable sources (more than one) that it wasnt Skiddy...so I'm not going to push the 'ban Skiddy' MO.

I hear it was all Brb's doing and how so? Makes sense.

 

One of the clique?