Nice of you to ignore the majority of my post and focus on only 1 detail! Its not random to compare Evertons prem average finish with Moyes average. Since the prem began Everton have been in major financial hardship, so in actual fact it is more relevant than your comparing of 100 years of history. Which by the way Moyes compare favourably as 4th best in terms of win percentage. The fact is how Everton performed pre-Moyes is entirley relevant as it provides CURRENT perspective in which to accurately compare, not an overall history which is just ridiculous, the prem league has put football in to an entirely different context.
Moyes record shows that compared to his predecessors who had similar resources, he has turned the club around. Pre-Moyes Everton were probably operating on a par with the resources they had, with Moyes they are obviously operating above par. Where honestly do you expect Everton to finish? Above yourselves, City, Utd, Arsenal...... thats already 4 clubs, so the best he could ever hope to achieve realistically is an average of 5th, then you have Spurs and Liverpool who have far more resources than Moyes has ever had...... now we are 6 clubs down and we can see Moyes is about exactly where you would expect him to be. So really Moyes is probably one of the best in achieving what is expected of him. At some point Chelsea, Utd, City, Spurs, Arsenal, Liverpool (for sure) have all underperformed with the resources available....... yet Moyes consistently delivers what is REALISTIC to deliver within the confines of what he has available.
Care to respond, point by point........... thought not!