One thing he quite obviously didn't do is lose the dressing room. But you're otherwise spot on. We've shown little attacking intent, he's been obsessed with the 4-4-2 and he's refused to use the 3-5-2 that has gotten him out of jail on numerous occasions to start games.
You shouldn't take my post seriously, I don't know why he got the sack and to be honest, I don't really care - they come, they go, it's the nature of the beast and to quote the wonderful Mr D Trump ''he knew what he'd signed up for''. My post was a bit of a piss take of the experts who, with alarming regularity trot out these lines when results go against their teams.
I don't think we said he was the "real" reason for the title win. Merely that the country was crying over the fact Ranieri was sacked and proclaimed him the sole reason we won the league when clearly a lot of people had a lot to do with it.
Since 2011... Sven-Göran Eriksson Jon Rudkin (caretaker) Nigel Pearson Claudio Ranieri Craig Shakespeare
To be fair Puel didn't do a bad job at Southampton, it was just the style of play many didn't like, but they finished in a 8th spot in the league and got to Wembley. A season most would have been happy with.
