Good to have you back KojakIt’s good to be back
No issues with Reams on this occasion - unlike some, he’s seen the light where the ownership is concerned.
Unfortunately the cock Hawtrey & his equally boring chum took exception to being challenged on their pro Andy Scott views - in spite of the fact that “TCH” had previously admitted in a DM that he enjoys a WUM on ITTV.
My refusal to laugh at his little “jokes” about 5 more sleeps til Wycombe or xGA led to a grassing session.
ITTV is very tedious when the same handful of geeks are agreeing with each other how clever they are every day.
.
Welcome back matey
He drones on, a bit like RidiculousCheers Lardi.
Just to repeat - no problem on ITTV with Reams.
BTW, can I say what a visionary you were several years ago with your comment about Mundell
“He’s fine, just so long as you are liking his posts”.
The guy doesn’t possess a scintilla of humour, and hates it when his “man splaining” on ITTV gets called out.
I had several DMs from other ITTV members agreeing with me what a pair of bores these two are …before the grassing got too much.
True South Londoners never grass
.
He drones on, a bit like Ridiculous
What can be said in one line takes 500 words.
...BTW, can I say what a visionary you were several years ago with your comment about Mundell
“He’s fine, just so long as you are liking his posts”.
He gets a lot of likes for his lengthy posts, and in my view most of them are automatic - a kind of learned response.
His essays appear at first glance to be thought provoking, which would be a good thing.
But his reaction when questioned on any aspect of them reveals his intent to be rather more like thought sedating.
No need to think for yourself about this, because I've just done it for you.
And if you choose to differ with anything more assertive than cowed meekness, he gets very uptight
He knows his stuff , a bit like youRidiculous has thrown out another random %, 60% of the income from the club shop goes towards our playing budget.
Really?
As our latest recruit can testify to, at the Woolwich meeting around 2016 when the protests were in full flow, Ridiculous was introduced representing the shelf stackers site. It was met with as much enthusiasm as being asked to buy a season ticket at s***hurst p**k.
But we’ve got very rich owners who’ve shown that they are prepared to spend lots of money on playerzzzzzzzThe eloquent wum has today posted that until gates and commercial revenue increase 6 players on 6-8k a week will be our limit recruitment wise
He probably wanted to see what aisle they’d be in after ten weeks
