Serious takeover talk

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Kittenmittons said:
I disagree. GOM is no closer to the accounts than I am, he just takes a view that everything is fine and people laud him for it because they can't separate commentary on the owner with criticism of the club. For example, when I said the april loan could have been used to pay off Short, he decided it couldn't because there's a slight delay in companies house updating. When I said it was theoretically possible that they were linked, he conceded it was possible but unlikely.

Lo and behold, Donald came out and said it was.

All I'm saying is the glossiest, glass half full interpretation is still no more valid or invalid than one that cautions about potential risk.

I'll start an accounts thread to prevent derailment and avoid being called autistic and paranoid.
Click to expand...

What a disingenuous post that is mate. Grumpy has spent hours and hours analysing what data was available and providing insight into the club's finances,which is more than you've ever done. Just because you got something right with your back of a *** packet calculations,suddenly you're the next Finance Director of Amazon..........:emoticon-0102-bigsm:emoticon-0102-bigsm.........give it a rest man,ffs!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nostradamoose, The Dude, BlooPop and 10 others
Kittenmittons said:
I disagree. GOM is no closer to the accounts than I am, he just takes a view that everything is fine and people laud him for it because they can't separate commentary on the owner with criticism of the club. For example, when I said the april loan could have been used to pay off Short, he decided it couldn't because there's a slight delay in companies house updating. When I said it was theoretically possible that they were linked, he conceded it was possible but unlikely.

Lo and behold, Donald came out and said it was.

All I'm saying is the glossiest, glass half full interpretation is still no more valid or invalid than one that cautions about potential risk.

I'll start an accounts thread to prevent derailment and avoid being called autistic and paranoid.
Click to expand...
Please do, does everybody who reads it have to wear a tinfoil hat?
 
sad-eyed prophet said:
What a disingenuous post that is mate. Grumpy has spent hours and hours analysing what data was available and providing insight into the club's finances,which is more than you've ever done. Just because you got something right with your back of a *** packet calculations,suddenly you're the next Finance Director of Amazon..........:emoticon-0102-bigsm:emoticon-0102-bigsm.........give it a rest man,ffs!
Click to expand...
Bloke cant help himself..
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sid, turnthetide3 and sad-eyed prophet
Kittenmittons said:
I disagree. GOM is no closer to the accounts than I am, he just takes a view that everything is fine and people laud him for it because they can't separate commentary on the owner with criticism of the club. For example, when I said the april loan could have been used to pay off Short, he decided it couldn't because there's a slight delay in companies house updating. When I said it was theoretically possible that they were linked, he conceded it was possible but unlikely.

Lo and behold, Donald came out and said it was.

All I'm saying is the glossiest, glass half full interpretation is still no more valid or invalid than one that cautions about potential risk.

I'll start an accounts thread to prevent derailment and avoid being called autistic and paranoid.
Click to expand...

That's totally incorrect.

He has too much integrity to bullshit, he always gives his honest opinion on whatever he's asked.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nostradamoose, sad-eyed prophet, MKmackem and 5 others
Kittenmittons said:
I disagree. GOM is no closer to the accounts than I am, he just takes a view that everything is fine and people laud him for it because they can't separate commentary on the owner with criticism of the club. For example, when I said the april loan could have been used to pay off Short, he decided it couldn't because there's a slight delay in companies house updating. When I said it was theoretically possible that they were linked, he conceded it was possible but unlikely.

Lo and behold, Donald came out and said it was.

All I'm saying is the glossiest, glass half full interpretation is still no more valid or invalid than one that cautions about potential risk.

I'll start an accounts thread to prevent derailment and avoid being called autistic and paranoid.
Click to expand...

I like to see both views tbh mate enjoy your posts too as when it comes to the financial side I'm clueless
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kittenmittons
gelders pie said:
The idea of leaving then rejoining has given me an idea which might suit everyone and break the deadlock. How about we leave and then form a new breakaway EU. Only allow members who will agree to properly voted positions, agree to emphasis on trade and cooperation, and ensure the end of jobs for the boys, unquestioned expenses, huge pensions and corruption.
Click to expand...
So just go back to the way it was originally set up?

Sounds good to me. No need for politics to be involved.
 
Still no news, this takeover is taking longer to announce than an elephant takes to give birth.

At least I have managed to get some work done.

If we are having a separate accounts based thread, can I ask if anything accounts based that's posted is written in plain English so non financial people like me can understand it :emoticon-0142-happy
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kittenmittons
Gazj2k said:
This wont happen
Click to expand...
If this takeover craic had never ever come out me, you or anyone would know nowt about it and wouldn't be asking every day if or when it's happening

We would have just woke up one day and seen it on safc.com Your best bet is just to forget about it and wait till it appears on the clubs website
 
  • Like
Reactions: Saf
Kittenmittons said:
I disagree. GOM is no closer to the accounts than I am, he just takes a view that everything is fine and people laud him for it because they can't separate commentary on the owner with criticism of the club. For example, when I said the april loan could have been used to pay off Short, he decided it couldn't because there's a slight delay in companies house updating. When I said it was theoretically possible that they were linked, he conceded it was possible but unlikely.

Lo and behold, Donald came out and said it was.

All I'm saying is the glossiest, glass half full interpretation is still no more valid or invalid than one that cautions about potential risk.

I'll start an accounts thread to prevent derailment and avoid being called autistic and paranoid.
Click to expand...
Thank **** for your last paragraph....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back