Scottish Football Needs A Format Change

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Yeah , heard that, Dev. As a club I think we have aways done our business a bit less shouting from the rooftops style.

Obvious to a blind man can see jiggery pokery went on. But I'm a spastic, what da **** would I know.

We were outstanding tonight , mate, hope that's the points that win the 4th iar <ok>
 
Is resolution 12 in relation to rangers getting liquidated and starting again in div 3?

Well, you dont know that rangers got preferential treatment as no other scottish top division team has been liquidated ...and celtic never will, so you can only guess. You can also guess that celtic probably would have got treated the same.

We argued about your belief in a conspiracy against celtic by referees ... youre arguing a different point altogether here .
 
Last edited:
pud said:
Is resolution 12 in relation to rangers getting liquidated and starting again in div 3?

Well, you dont know that rangers got preferential treatment as no other scottish top division team has been liquidated ...and celtic never will, so you can only guess. You can also guess that celtic probably would have got treated the same.

We argued about your belief in a conspiracy against celtic by referees ... youre arguing a different point altogether here ... so no idea why your still going on about being called a spastic.
Click to expand...

It's about Rangers being cleared to play in Europe despite having had a tax issue outstanding. The SFA cleared them with UEFA, it was never declared by the SFA.

http://videocelts.com/2013/11/blogs...shareholders-licence-concerns-straight-to-sfa
 
pud said:
Is resolution 12 in relation to rangers getting liquidated and starting again in div 3?

Well, you dont know that rangers got preferential treatment as no other scottish top division team has been liquidated ...and celtic never will, so you can only guess. You can also guess that celtic probably would have got treated the same.

We argued about your belief in a conspiracy against celtic by referees ... youre arguing a different point altogether here .
Click to expand...

Res 12 is just one more example of thems getting preferential treatment...and im not arguing the point, it's fact! I take it all those Celtic Shareholders are spastics too, eh?
 
Last edited:
BigAudioDynamite said:
Res 12 is just one more example of thems getting preferential treatment...and im not arguing the point, it's fact! I take it all those Celtic Shareholders are spastics too, eh?
Click to expand...
Aye if they or anyone else firmly 100% believe that if it were Celtic not Rangers that was liquidated that the authorities would not have done the same as they did to rangers ...hope that makes sense I'm hungover.

Basically , Celtic would have also been granted a licence under any circumstances if it meant they could immediately start again.

Of course they would have ... Plain n simple .
 
pud said:
Aye if they or anyone else firmly 100% believe that if it were Celtic not Rangers that was liquidated that the authorities would not have done the same as they did to rangers ...hope that makes sense I'm hungover.

Basically , Celtic would have also been granted a licence under any circumstances if it meant they could immediately start again.

Of course they would have ... Plain n simple .
Click to expand...

If I believed that the game was corrupt i'd jack in watching it, seriously. I don't think there's any doubt Rangers were given all sorts of favours, in fact they are still being given favours if you look at what happened to Livingston. I like to think Celtic would have been treated the same, I honestly don't know though, I can't be 100% sure but I certainly don't think Refs are bent or are being manipulated, they are just being protected.

Bobby Madden who is supposed to be a Rangers season ticket holder has actually looked to be one of the better Refs this season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Null
The two biggest clubs in Scotland ...at the time... One of them would not be allowed to disappear by the authorities. To think otherwise <doh>
 
DevAdvocate said:
If I believed that the game was corrupt i'd jack in watching it, seriously. I don't think there's any doubt Rangers were given all sorts of favours, in fact they are still being given favours if you look at what happened to Livingston. I like to think Celtic would have been treated the same, I honestly don't know though, I can't be 100% sure but I certainly don't think Refs are bent or are being manipulated, they are just being protected.

Bobby Madden who is supposed to be a Rangers season ticket holder has actually looked to be one of the better Refs this season.
Click to expand...

Refs will personally favour a team ... Of course they will, they are football fans.

Some are more professional than others ....
 
BigAudioDynamite said:
<laugh>

**** me,

Oh, "Am oot in da big bad world" tops anything that has ever been said on here...:)
Click to expand...

<laugh> Ye cannae even quote right, ya spastic. Imagine being an adult and asking folk for fights on the internet. No surprise though when you're a thick weegie ***** <ok>
 
  • Like
Reactions: EDGE.
BigAudioDynamite said:
Res 12 is just one more example of thems getting preferential treatment...and im not arguing the point, it's fact! I take it all those Celtic Shareholders are spastics too, eh?
Click to expand...

<rofl>

Celtic shareholder here, and i think you're a spastic.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back