There are things known and there are things unknown, and in between are the doors of perception...
I started reading his books after I got into the Doors.
...and now jim Morrison
There are things known and there are things unknown, and in between are the doors of perception...
I started reading his books after I got into the Doors.
The SP has control over NHS spending in Scotland does it not?
So you did not read the link then?
Glasgow leading the way!No c**t lives past 60 = cheaper health care.
No **** lives past 60 = cheaper health care.
The Scottish Gov't has control of the NHS budget but the pot of money is decided by Westminster.
Basically we're like a housewife from the 1950s getting house money from her husband.
was the money spent on the NHS, Tarquin?
I read the Independent for the first time in years on Friday I think it was.
One article (by GG) stated that the proposed cut to corporation tax would mean a "race to the bottom" in terms of low paid jobs with the lower paid echelons of Scottish and rUK society suffering.
Two pages on, a column claimed that independent Scotland would have higher corporate taxes (to fund "Salmond's welfare promises"), the increased rate of corporate tax would mean that businesses would move down South meaning lower paid people in Scotland would lose their jobs.
It doesn't take a genius to realise that these two scenarios are mutually paradoxical.
Even so, if either outcome occurs, how come they were portrayed as both being bad for the same groups of people?
Load.
Of.
****e.