Scotch Independence - the countdown

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Should Scotland be an Independent Country?

  • Yes

  • No

Results are only viewable after voting.
Spurf said:
I think your maths are a little bit astray. That's not 24% of the population of Scotland that's 24% of the undecided who were at the debate. <laugh>

But then again the NO's are not famous for their intelect, just look at this thread. I met a numpty yesterday with his union jack t- shirt he was voting No because he was skint! <doh> Then another of the bright lights of the Orange Lodge living in squalor on a council estate with no job and no prospects. He's also voting no because of the Queen. <laugh>

Good luck with that! <doh>
Click to expand...

I know you complete fool, but if say the NO camp has got 47% and it also gets 24% of the undecided which is maybe 15%, then it would take the NO camp over the 50% mark, by **** you are not very smart, are you a dirty fenian bastard by any chance?
 
monacoger said:
I know you complete fool, but if say the NO camp has got 47% and it also gets 24% of the undecided which is maybe 15%, then it would take the NO camp over the 50% mark, by **** you are not very smart, are you a dirty fenian bastard by any chance?
Click to expand...

Who supports Spurs <laugh>

Your maths are still wrong!


One day!


Out of their own mouths>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <laugh>
 
Spurf said:
Who supports Spurs <laugh>

Your maths are still wrong!


One day!


Out of their own mouths>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <laugh>
Click to expand...

So if it was already 47% and it added another 24% of the remaining 15% it wouldn't be a grand total of more than 50%? You are an idiot.
 
monacoger said:
So if it was already 47% and it added another 24% of the remaining 15% it wouldn't be a grand total of more than 50%? You are an idiot.
Click to expand...

Other will judge <laugh>

The total voting population of Scotland is what 3 million! The 24% of undecided who's support fro Darling was poled amounts to about 15 people. I don't think that will be decisive do you. <laugh>
 
Spurf said:
Other will judge <laugh>

The total voting population of Scotland is what 3 million! The 24% of undecided who's support fro Darling was poled amounts to about 15 people. I don't think that will be decisive do you. <laugh>
Click to expand...

**** me, we are speaking proportionally of the poll, otherwise what is the point of having polls(to be honest I think they are a waste of time), but my maths certainly wasn't wrong.
 
Spurf said:
Which is what it's all about! The media is pro union or didn't you notice.
Click to expand...

To be fair, pro or anti union, I think Salmond made a bit of a cock of himself trying to be a smart arse. It backed fired. So, fair play to papers for giving him it tight.
 
pud said:
To be fair, pro or anti union, I think Salmond made a bit of a cock of himself trying to be a smart arse. It backed fired. So, fair play to papers for giving him it tight.
Click to expand...

He won the votes that matter he is not going to change the mind of strong No voters is he. The rest is media spin.

I saw a calm Salmond and shouting pointing Darling it was clear to me who was most rattled and who answerered very few of the questions put to him and it wasn't Salmond..
 
I never watched this Live debate, did'nt need to. Salmond can be a bit of a bore at time but compared to Darling he's a ****ing party animal. Anyone who would take Darling's word for anything should be sectioned.
 
Spurf said:
He won the votes that matter he is not going to change the mind of strong No voters is he. The rest is media spin.

I saw a calm Salmond and shouting pointing Darling it was clear to me who was most rattled and who answerered very few of the questions put to him and it wasn't Salmond..
Click to expand...

and you're not bias?
 
Spurf said:
He won the votes that matter he is not going to change the mind of strong No voters is he. The rest is media spin.

I saw a calm Salmond and shouting pointing Darling it was clear to me who was most rattled and who answerered very few of the questions put to him and it wasn't Salmond..
Click to expand...

He won the votes that matter? The total voting population of Scotland is what 3 million! The x% of undecided who's support for Salmond was poled amounts to about 45 people. I don't think that will be decisive do you.
 
Two reasons to support the Union.

1. You are rich
2 You want to maintain the UK's imperial role playing.


If you want a fairer wealthier life you need to vote YES this is your chance for a brighter future.

Get rid of your stupid outdated prejudices there are many Rangers supporters supporting Independence there are over 200,000 Labour supporters voting for Independence despite their party and more joining every day.

The YES movement is not about politiciians most are not even members of the SNP or any other party this is a grassroots movement. Yesterday we had thousands of people out all over Scotland for YES. I was in Kirkmuirhill, some of you will know that there is an Orange Lodge there and union jacks were flying but still about 50% of the people we canvassed were YES with about 20% don't knows. Not bad for such an area. On the ground it looks as if this is going to be very close indeed.

YES is rolling and it's not going away! <ok>
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back