Wikipedia is not gospel.
I didn't get it from Wiki.
Now do I get a prize?
Wikipedia is not gospel.
I didn't get it from Wiki.
Now do I get a prize?
I did not say that.I am asking if she was related to someone who was on the council (as someone told me today-correctly or incorrectly).I did not say she was a council stooge.I would simply like clarification if someone knows.A woman rings a local radio station and makes a very personal and emotional case for keeping a clubs historic name and you think she might be a council stooge?
You're sir, are not right in the head.
Obviously from your non-ignorant education on Spanish geography. Your prize is my attention.

I did not say that.I am asking if she was related to someone who was on the council (as someone told me today-correctly or incorrectly).I did not say she was a council stooge.I would simply like clarification if someone knows.
maybe... but we will be seen as trailblazers, pioneers
I got bored of writing i'm trying to have a siesta. Embrace it, try to be united behind someone that I think has the right to do what he wants to do especially after he spent the money he has done. ITS A BUSINESS, if you bought a local business and spent millions on it but you couldn't re-brand it because the loyal customers would be upset even though it was losing money and was in millions of debt....Of course not keep the name.
Often it's not the pioneers who make the money.
If Norwich Predators or some other club name is proven to be a more lucrative name than Hull Tigers would you be in favour of dropping "Tigers" for another name?
That's **** 100%
Spouting about doing a Bradford, they're OK.
What exactly should I be embracing?
The fact we've got double the debt now than when he took over, how is that good business
The fact he throws his dummy out the pram if he doesn't get his own way (ask HCC).
The fact he threatens to walk away if anyone questions him.
The fact he declares he's running the club for the community but refuses to listen to them.
The fact he said he'll liaise with the supporters then threatens, thus preventing HCOSC from running a ballot to gauge name change opinion prior to the Chelsea game
The fact he likens long term supporters (supporters who have previously assisted in saving the club) as hooligans.
The fact he suggests supporters who sing "City 'til I die" can die as soon as they like.
The fact that he hasn't really spent millions, he's burdened the club with millions of pounds of debt, declaring it a gift yet collecting interest.
The fact he's disenfranchising & disregarding his loyal customers because of a petulant spat with the council.
The fact that he hasn't actually revealed his master plan?
The fact he reveled his idea for world domination to the local rag & local news?
The fact he repeatedly declared there was no intention to change the club name?
The fact that he doesn't know what the club is called?
The fact he thinks we have no European players playing for us?
The fact that he's that volatile the future of the club will forever be in doubt.
I would answer each point in turn but you are clutching at straws sir
'Tigers' are far more lucrative in Asian markets than any other name.
That's **** 100%
Spouting about doing a Bradford, they're OK.
What exactly should I be embracing?
The fact we've got double the debt now than when he took over, how is that good business
The fact he throws his dummy out the pram if he doesn't get his own way (ask HCC).
The fact he threatens to walk away if anyone questions him.
The fact he declares he's running the club for the community but refuses to listen to them.
The fact he said he'll liaise with the supporters then threatens, thus preventing HCOSC from running a ballot to gauge name change opinion prior to the Chelsea game
The fact he likens long term supporters (supporters who have previously assisted in saving the club) as hooligans.
The fact he suggests supporters who sing "City 'til I die" can die as soon as they like.
The fact that he hasn't really spent millions, he's burdened the club with millions of pounds of debt, declaring it a gift yet collecting interest.
The fact he's disenfranchising & disregarding his loyal customers because of a petulant spat with the council.
The fact that he hasn't actually revealed his master plan?
The fact he reveled his idea for world domination to the local rag & local news?
The fact he repeatedly declared there was no intention to change the club name?
The fact that he doesn't know what the club is called?
The fact he thinks we have no European players playing for us?
The fact that he's that volatile the future of the club will forever be in doubt.
Unfortunately Prescott's views are only invalid because he doesn't support CTWD.
If he had come out supporting them then his views would be shouted from the rooftops.
I'm simply asking which parts I should embrace.
Who is the majority shareholder..........He is. His club more than our's i'm afraid. Sad I know but it is a business and he can do what he wants. If you don't like it vote with your attendance. Don't go, however, you will and the other 25,000 will so i'm just a bit lost. If people really gave two you know what they would stop purchasing all merchandise and tickets. P.s, we are hooligans
well, as AA said that it is definitely going through, you had best get used to it.
There is nothing to stop you calling them whatever you want.
The official name is changing, that's all.
So you feel comfortable that Hull Tigers won't change their name in the future? Would you be bothered if they changed from Hull Tigers to say Hull Lions if the African market really expanded?'Tigers' are far more lucrative in Asian markets than any other name.
But it's not his decision. He doesn't even know what we're called now.
So you feel comfortable that Hull Tigers won't change their name in the future? Would you be bothered if they changed from Hull Tigers to say Hull Lions if the African market really expanded?
Who is the majority shareholder..........He is. His club more than our's i'm afraid. Sad I know but it is a business and he can do what he wants. If you don't like it vote with your attendance. Don't go, however, you will and the other 25,000 will so i'm just a bit lost. If people really gave two you know what they would stop purchasing all merchandise and tickets. P.s, we are hooligans