Do you think he looked at the list and thought "**** man, that shouldn't be on there" and so took it anyway?

Do you think he looked at the list and thought "**** man, that shouldn't be on there" and so took it anyway?

Undoubtedly. Mama knows best.Do you think he looked at the list and thought "**** man, that shouldn't be on there" and so took it anyway?
Do you think he looked at the list and thought "**** man, that shouldn't be on there" and so took it anyway?
Undoubtedly. Mama knows best.
It shouldn't have been on do the FA ****ed up.
However, rightly or wrongly, it WAS on the list.

Well it's clearly wrongly on the list - hence it not being on there now![]()
Correct. But it was (wrongly) on the list so should Sakho have taken it?
It isn't a banned substance hence he's been dismissed. It shouldn't have been on the list.
Total **** up all round.
No.
But he was rightly acquitted.
Massive **** up all round.
You do know Sakho wasn't banned from the EURO's don't you?It's like someone at UEFA writing "hippy crack and fanta" on the banned list and then Sterling missing out on the Euros
Why the **** didn't we think of this before
You do know Sakho wasn't banned from the EURO's don't you?
His country just think he was worth taking since they already had 4 better CHs![]()
I didn't say he was banned
He missed out due to the uncertainty and lack of match fitness
Real countries don't employ Hodgson who will take someone who boards the plane on his first fit day in 2 years

Ate you suggesting England isn't a real country?![]()
Do you think he looked at the list and thought "**** man, that shouldn't be on there" and so took it anyway?
I agree it's a total mess and do feel sorry for him a little if he was given bad advice, to be honest though the only advice he should seek is from the club.I think the issue is that the 'banned substance' isn't on the WADA list which is the world wide independent drugs testing body.
He consulted with experts outside of football during his pre season training who were cross checking against the WADA list and not the UEFA list.
Even so, he or the experts he consulted should be more up to speed.
It's a messy set of circumstances but I can't help feel sorry for him for missing two major sporting occasions.
I think the issue is that the 'banned substance' isn't on the WADA list which is the world wide independent drugs testing body.
He consulted with experts outside of football during his pre season training who were cross checking against the WADA list and not the UEFA list.
Even so, he or the experts he consulted should be more up to speed.
It's a messy set of circumstances but I can't help feel sorry for him for missing two major sporting occasions.
This statement is a total joke.....
"The proceedings against Mr Sakho related to a violation of the UEFA Anti-Doping Regulations after the player failed a doping test at the above-mentioned match. Following a hearing with the lawyers of the player and experts of the WADA-accredited laboratories on this case, the CEDB has decided to dismiss the case."
No explanation of why he was banned in the first place or anything. I would have thought they might have had the balls to admit that someone ****ed up by putting it on the UEFA list when it wasn't on WADA.
Can't sue somebody for telling the truth, he did fail a doping test.Sakho should sue the **** out of them for saying he "failed a doping test"
They should have stuck with "Sakho's sample tested positive for a substance on our list of banned substances"