Saints Stuff

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Just seen a headline that we are waiting on a stopper return....going to have a whinge now. A stopper is a GK...please stop using it to refer to a defender (in this case, Virgil). Are we American? No, we are not!!!!!!!!!!!!
It's just another trendy word the pundits will adopt readily. As you say, a stopper [if we have to use that term] is a goalkeeper. Yes, the bloke who keeps the goal. Actually, to be honest, goalkeeper is little odd, but there you go.

The pet one that has annoyed me over the last couple of years is that strikers play 'up top'. No they don't. They play 'up front'. They don't play the game on a vertical tactics board, where diagrammatically their name is on top of a group of players in their positions. Strikers play on a horizontal pitch, closest to the opposition goal, at the front of the formation. So no more of this stupid up top please. Up front it should return to being.

I blame Ron Atkinson. In fact, it's probably a safe thing to blame Ron Atkinson for everything. And not just in football either.
 
It's just another trendy word the pundits will adopt readily. As you say, a stopper [if we have to use that term] is a goalkeeper. Yes, the bloke who keeps the goal. Actually, to be honest, goalkeeper is little odd, but there you go.

The pet one that has annoyed me over the last couple of years is that strikers play 'up top'. No they don't. They play 'up front'. They don't play the game on a vertical tactics board, where diagrammatically their name is on top of a group of players in their positions. Strikers play on a horizontal pitch, closest to the opposition goal, at the front of the formation. So no more of this stupid up top please. Up front it should return to being.

I blame Ron Atkinson. In fact, it's probably a safe thing to blame Ron Atkinson for everything. And not just in football either.
I remember reading somewhere about a reporter that asked Ron how he communicated with the players at a time he was coaching in Spain and he said "I just add an O to words, like youo have to passo the ballo to himo"
 
It's just another trendy word the pundits will adopt readily. As you say, a stopper [if we have to use that term] is a goalkeeper. Yes, the bloke who keeps the goal. Actually, to be honest, goalkeeper is little odd, but there you go.

The pet one that has annoyed me over the last couple of years is that strikers play 'up top'. No they don't. They play 'up front'. They don't play the game on a vertical tactics board, where diagrammatically their name is on top of a group of players in their positions. Strikers play on a horizontal pitch, closest to the opposition goal, at the front of the formation. So no more of this stupid up top please. Up front it should return to being.

I blame Ron Atkinson. In fact, it's probably a safe thing to blame Ron Atkinson for everything. And not just in football either.

And another thing ... :emoticon-0133-wait: we all used to know what players were meant to be like. Wingers were small and nippy, for example. The centre half was meant to be huge and eat children for breakfast. That Bobby Moore guy buggered all that. All golden boy, smoother than a baby's bum and could actually play football. What was he doing in the centre of defence?

Terminology moves on, but does it improve the language or our understanding of concepts? Philosophical debate of the day :emoticon-0113-sleep:emoticon-0113-sleep:emoticon-0113-sleep
 
http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/sport/saints/news/15145893.Matt_s_comeback_Targett/?ref=rss

Echo suggesting that Targett hopes to play for the U23 before the end of the season. Really feel for Matt....nailed on behind Bertrand, but now has to fight his way back into contention. Must have been some hamstring injury.

In all honesty, I think I prefer McQueen - and this is no slight on Targett, who I also think is a very good player, but McQueen offers a little more going forward
 
That's what happens when injuries occur. Targett was back up, so played when Bertrand was out. His injury meant that McQueen got a look in. The same thing has happened with Jack following Virgil's 'accident.' If a team has real competition and is willing to give youngsters a chance, a career can have a total turnaround.