Saints Academy Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
tomw24 said:
You must log in or register to see media
Click to expand...
Only just seen this on another news thread. Obviously hope he’s ok & the move hasn’t damaged him. Hopefully he returns, gets his mojo back & continues to develop which will be great for him, Saints & definitely won’t hurt when some other up&coming young stars “see” a future elsewhere. Might make them think twice?
 
SaintInKuwait said:
I’m relieved that Dibling’s move back was swift and that (it appears) the clubs and all stakeholders were able to cooperate in order to prioritise the welfare of a child.
Click to expand...
I can’t imagine how hard it would be to make a good decision at that age. I think back and I made so many poor decisions about little things. I would made a mess of a decision like that for sure.
 
Ballard starting in this one as well as the young player from spurs. It looks like we only signed the attacker and not the left back from that double deal that was mentioned. As Dibling shows it seems deals in that age group are not always set
 
Last edited:
SAINTOSPREY said:
B Team 2 - 0 down after 20 mins at Leeds. Bamford and Summerville.

4 0 down 42 mins

5 0 down 53 mins.

6 - 0 down 55 minutes

7 0 down 69 mins

8 - 0 FULL TIME so the OS quotes.

However I am thinking it might be 6 - 2 because the last two goals were scored by Ballard and Bellis and I am sure they weren't og's!
Click to expand...
Can't really read anything into that result as Leeds fielded a fair few first team players.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back