"You can't always get what you want but sometimes you get what you need"If he's injury prone, it may be for the best. And remember he may not be our best choice....he is the best we can get at the moment.
"You can't always get what you want but sometimes you get what you need"If he's injury prone, it may be for the best. And remember he may not be our best choice....he is the best we can get at the moment.
I don't get this lack of faith in Jack Stephens, he has to break into the first team at some point and he has lots of first team experience on loan for the last few years albeit at a lower level and is a current England U21 international. From what I've seen of him, he looks calm and confident in possession, he certainly doesn't look like a "deer in the headlights".
I don't get this lack of faith in Jack Stephens, he has to break into the first team at some point and he has lots of first team experience on loan for the last few years albeit at a lower level and is a current England U21 international. From what I've seen of him, he looks calm and confident in possession, he certainly doesn't look like a "deer in the headlights".
He doesn't have to break into the first team eventually - he may just not be good enough. I'm not saying he isn't, just that it is defintely a possibility.
My brother is a Coventry City supporter and saw a fair bit of him last season - he wasnt exactly impressive and that was in league 1. Obviously this doesn't mean he definitely won't come good (look at Harry Kane) but it is an explanation as to why not everyone is 100% confident in him.
Vastly inexperienced at the top level too. Plenty of question marks over him but he certainly has the chance to prove himself now.
Agree 100%. Don't think it's a lack of faith as such, though - more a contingency plan if either he or Yoshida get injured. Gives us an extra body in case the worst was to happen.
Question marks based on what?, all of our Academy lads that have played this season have been brilliant, I judge avery player on what I witness myself and I've been impressed with what i've seen so far.
Question marks based on what?, all of our Academy lads that have played this season have been brilliant, I judge every player on what I witness myself and I've been impressed with what i've seen so far.
Based on what I outlined.
1. The fact that he has no experience at this level.
2. The fact he didn't play particularly well in league one last season, which is significantly below the premier league.
3. The fact that whilst he has had a few good games for us, he has never had a lengthy spell of football to suggest he is good enough.
Whilst it is not a ridiculous opinion to think he has what it takes to make it at this level, it is odd to claim there is no question as the whether he is good enough for us.
Well that doesn't apply to all my points but I'll put it this way.If he doesn't play then how can he be judged...it is a prejudgement.
So you would need to see more of him before you can say whether he is good enough?I would wait until i'd seen him play, we have professional talent scouts and coaches and if they think he is good enough for Saints, then i'll reserve my judgement until i've seen that player in action
I I agree entirely, but I think you chose the wrong example. Put Virgil in a poor team and he'd just do everything himself, including scoring goals. Even in a reasonable Celtic side he sparkled like a diamond.If you've been through the Saints academy and you're still with Saints, you're a good player. (unless our academy is rubbish?) If you put VVD in a poor lower league team, surrounded by 10 poor lower league team mates he wouldn't find it easy.
but if Celtic weren't winning every game, and were really bad would it be so easy?I I agree entirely, but I think you chose the wrong example. Put Virgil in a poor team and he'd just do everything himself, including scoring goals. Even in a reasonable Celtic side he sparkled like a diamond.
I watched him in a couple of CL games (can't remember who against) and Celtic were struggling. Virgil was basically playing like a box-to-box midfielder but defending as well!but if Celtic weren't winning every game, and were really bad would it be so easy?
If you've been through the Saints academy and you're still with Saints, you're a good player. (unless our academy is rubbish?) If you put VVD in a poor lower league team, surrounded by 10 poor lower league team mates he wouldn't find it easy.
Stephens is highly rated by many at the academy. Isgrove isn't.So let's start Isgrove against Sunderland shall we?
Yes you are clearly good if you make it through the Saints academy, but not necessarily good enough. That is the point I am making.