Ryan Mason

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Cahill is to blame , who else did it ? Blame doesn't apportion intent. I never said there was intent or malice. I just asked the question was it reckless ? Some posters think not others do.

There is no blame... it was an accident.
I'm guessing that you've never played competitive sport?? **** happens, it wasn't anyone's fault
 
Cahill is to blame , who else did it ? Blame doesn't apportion intent. I never said there was intent or malice. I just asked the question was it reckless ? Some posters think not others do.

Blame does imply intent. You could say that whichever Chelsea player crossed the ball in is 'to blame' for the ball even being there. Mason to blame for not being aware of players around him. Jak to blame for not coming out to punch the ball clear.

Etc. Etc.

No one was to blame, it was an accident.
 
If the worst came to the worst and Ryan couldn't play again under clinical advice, are we insured for such an eventuality?
 
If the worst came to the worst and Ryan couldn't play again under clinical advice, are we insured for such an eventuality?

What happened with Cech and Long - was that a fracture of the skull?

I mean, I could google it but....

Edit - sorry not Long, but Hunt. I knew one of our players got booed for it.
 
Cahill is to blame , who else did it ? Blame doesn't apportion intent. I never said there was intent or malice. I just asked the question was it reckless ? Some posters think not others do.


No doubt you're going to dream up some bizarre conspiracy theory..

It was an accident.
 
If the worst came to the worst and Ryan couldn't play again under clinical advice, are we insured for such an eventuality?

Most professional footballers have their own career ending injury insurance.

In fact, there's one bloke who handles the insurance for a third of all Premier League players and a quarter of all Championship players.

He has a very nice car collection.
 
I think Cahill was instructed to do it by the premier league which is why the referee allowed him to get away with. They're trying everything they can to get the Allams out of their league and who can blame them?

They Lino & Ref only failed to see the blatant foul on Hernandez, which should have resulted in a penalty, because Wenger pushed the fourth official.

The word on Conspiracy Street is that they can't punish the big Southern clubs, small Northern clubs have to take the hit for them.
 
Best wishes Ryan. What a sickener.

Don't know what this means in terms of how long he'll be out, I'd hazard a guess that a crack in the nut will finish his season? Too early to say.
 
Blame does imply intent. You could say that whichever Chelsea player crossed the ball in is 'to blame' for the ball even being there. Mason to blame for not being aware of players around him. Jak to blame for not coming out to punch the ball clear.

Etc. Etc.

No one was to blame, it was an accident.

Blame doesn't imply intent, it merely indicates that a person is responsible.

Someone can be blamed for an accident, it doesn't mean they intended to do it. For example, if I pull out at a junction without looking and a car hits me I am to blame for that accident even though it wasn't my intention to cause a collision.

If there is intent it is no longer by definition an accident.
 
Blame doesn't imply intent, it merely indicates that a person is responsible.

Someone can be blamed for an accident, it doesn't mean they intended to do it. For example, if I pull out at a junction without looking and a car hits me I am to blame for that accident even though it wasn't my intention to cause a collision.

If there is intent it is no longer by definition an accident.

Just give it a rest.