RTG

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
I've always thought he's a nasty piece of work who has always resorted to insults (thick and mouth breathers are two he's used on here to describe anyone who disagrees with his opinions) and then posts innuendos about their character if that doesn't result in them backing off.
Describing anyone who won't support his agenda as "thick" is somewhat ironic when he hasn't hidden his RL identity or the podcast he's affiliated to while spewing his toxic garbage.

Not the sharpest tool in the box shall we say.
 
Describing anyone who won't support his agenda as "thick" is somewhat ironic when he hasn't hidden his RL identity or the podcast he's affiliated to while spewing his toxic garbage.

Not the sharpest tool in the box shall we say.

Are you talking about me? I have never done a podcast and never would.
 
No seriously, I haven't. Who am I supposed to be? I can say right now I have never done a podcast, never spoken to anyone at any media outlet, didn't send that ridiculously libellous post that keeps being deleted (nor do I agree with some key points of it). I haven't posted about it on twitter or facebook either. Whoever you think I am, that's who I'm not.

Also, I never would do those things because who the hell wants to be the public face when people are so hostile to anything negative about our finances?
 
To be fair I don't think kittenmittons is doing owt wrong. He's raised something which he's admitted isn't illegal, he's tried to give sources, and although he's replied a lot it's often been because of people responding to him. If he has concerns I don't think there's much wrong with that, certainly doesn't warrant people jumping on him!
 
Wow. I'll definitely respond to this little campaign by you.

I'm 'doing this' because I don't agree with how the club is being run, and believe it has put us in a position where takeover is harder (because of the financial ramifications for Donald if he loses his seat at the table) and because I think that as a fan, it makes me uncomfortable to see him say that he has £20m that he won't put back into the club, despite us being objectively lower than we have ever been, with a worse squad than last year, and the prospect of an extended stay in League One.

I am not 'haway' or any other poster. I called people 'thick' and 'mouth breathers' because I was subject to a group of people trolling every post I made. I didn't just wade in and call people thick, it was people.like you, Roppa (who I definitely think is an interesting account if you read his posts) and others who questioned my character, motives etc.

Have a look at the posts I got in response and tell me if you'd have been quite as patient.

Oh and of course I'm not being paid. Utterly absurd.

I don't believe a word of your response, indeed, you've just demonstrated your character by referring to me as a 'troll'.

Stupid is as stupid does and not the demonstration of intelligence you wish it to portray!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nostradamoose
Why do you not believe it? I don't understand why you're so absolutely convinced that I'm another poster somewhere else. And yes, I was being trolled, I don't even know if you were one of them, but people giving me **** just for posting and then expecting me to be civil or ignore them... I mean like I said, what would your response be?
 
Why do you not believe it? I don't understand why you're so absolutely convinced that I'm another poster somewhere else. And yes, I was being trolled, I don't even know if you were one of them, but people giving me **** just for posting and then expecting me to be civil or ignore them... I mean like I said, what would your response be?

Yet the way you lashed out, without any evidence, speaks volumes about your mindset.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nostradamoose
If you think that calling people trolls is 'lashing out' I don't know what to say. If you think I don't have the right to say anything back when people respond to every post with hostility and claims of me being in the pay of people, or a mag, or just plain not liking Donald, then I think you're wrong.

I don't know why you're pushing this attack on my character, that's what is galling here, is that whether we agree or not on the finances, I ultimately care more about SAFC than anything else. If we questioned the motives of our owners as much as we questioned each other's, we'd be in a better position imo.
 
If you think that calling people trolls is 'lashing out' I don't know what to say. If you think I don't have the right to say anything back when people respond to every post with hostility and claims of me being in the pay of people, or a mag, or just plain not liking Donald, then I think you're wrong.

I don't know why you're pushing this attack on my character, that's what is galling here, is that whether we agree or not on the finances, I ultimately care more about SAFC than anything else. If we questioned the motives of our owners as much as we questioned each other's, we'd be in a better position imo.

Why not start your own finances based thread?
No accusations of thread derailing.
Those not at all interested wont look in.
Prob have to explain yourself less.
Less hassle all round.
 
Kildaremackem returned now on RTG stating that there is not a takeover to go through.

If he isn't Charlie he's definitely linked to the owners mind. Loved when he said Methven and Donald (I noticed he put Methven first) were trying to sell but "nobody wants it", despite multi billionaires setting up holding companies and coming over for a match. If they aren't interested now then it flies in the face of all the "we're in great condition" comments, because either we aren't, or Donald simply refuses to go. They can't have it both ways
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chizno1
Either volume of traffic or Roger has pulled the plug as he'd previously warned he would do?

Probably just an unrelated outage tbh. There won't have been a sudden surge in numbers accessing it, not as if a manager has actually been named or owt, and although people aren't happy there hasn't been any rise in the levels of abuse which would probably force him to take it off
 
Status
Not open for further replies.