The course does belong to HM so I suppose it is okay for her to take the faly for free!!!
I never knew Hughie Morrison owned Ascot, thanks Jannabelle.
The course does belong to HM so I suppose it is okay for her to take the faly for free!!!
The course does belong to HM so I suppose it is okay for her to take the family for free!!!

"I'm very hopeful. I'm bringing three guns with No Nay Never the number one."
Doubtless his stable mate is "Wild rover"![]()

I think that would require another Act repealing the original wouldn't it? If that's the case the Queen herself would have to give her Royal Ascent.
She's never withheld it but if you mess with her horses she might get the arse on and give Parliament the Royal finger.
. You go, Queen Liz. Tell em to "feck orff"this is a really good thread.
There are 3 horses I am particularly interested in at the moment - the odds on favourites, Animal Kingdom and Magician on day 1 and then Estimate in the Ascot Gold Cup.
There’s a quote from Coral’s PR spokeman in the papers today re next Tuesday at the meet and he’s fearful of a ‘blood bath’ because, even at this stage, punters are lumping on doubles concerning Animal Kingdom and Magician. The firm are 4/5 both horses and both have been laid by Coral’s for some serious money.

What is serious money?
If I could change anything about racing it would be TRANSPARENCY in the betting markets. How much money does it take to shift a horse from 5/2 to odds on in a week? How much of that is because of Farhh and Cityscape not running and how much of that is money coming for the beast?
Personally, when a PR guy for one of the big bookies talks up a horse I take it with a rather large pinch of salt.