Rosie's got a one game touchline ban...

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
The new measures state players "must not confront, invade the personal space of, or make physical contact with the match officials".

They add that "two or more players surrounding a match official in a confrontational manner will result in a yellow card and be reported to the Football Association".

Man City were fined £120k yesterday for this...

You must log in or register to see images
 
It should have been a yellow card for the player imeadiatly, and if he still carried on another one and sent him off

Like happened to the Man U player on Sunday, seemingly for less dissent....funny though as it happened to the team that have probably benefitted more from crap refereeing decisions than any other.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gone For A Walk
https://www.efl.com/news/2023/decem...-referee-decisions-at-85--so-far-this-season/

Interesting stuff from the EFL, as they have openly admitted that they only get 85% of key match decisions correct. That's ****e.

That might appear to be a high number, but it really isn't. So far, halfway through the season, they have got 99 key decisions wrong. That's about 5 every matchweek.

These aren't little decisions either, this is for penalties, goals, offsides, red cards.

And people wonder why Rosey and other managers have been so pissed off with performances of officials, only to see retrospective action only given to players and managers.
 
https://www.efl.com/news/2023/decem...-referee-decisions-at-85--so-far-this-season/

Interesting stuff from the EFL, as they have openly admitted that they only get 85% of key match decisions correct. That's ****e.

That might appear to be a high number, but it really isn't. So far, halfway through the season, they have got 99 key decisions wrong. That's about 5 every matchweek.

These aren't little decisions either, this is for penalties, goals, offsides, red cards.

And people wonder why Rosey and other managers have been so pissed off with performances of officials, only to see retrospective action only given to players and managers.
Sounds like an excuse to introduce the dreaded FVAR to me.
****bags
 
  • Like
Reactions: PLT
https://www.efl.com/news/2023/decem...-referee-decisions-at-85--so-far-this-season/

Interesting stuff from the EFL, as they have openly admitted that they only get 85% of key match decisions correct. That's ****e.

That might appear to be a high number, but it really isn't. So far, halfway through the season, they have got 99 key decisions wrong. That's about 5 every matchweek.

These aren't little decisions either, this is for penalties, goals, offsides, red cards.

And people wonder why Rosey and other managers have been so pissed off with performances of officials, only to see retrospective action only given to players and managers.

Still absolutely no justification for speaking to and treating officials like ****.

I bet the vast majority of players don't have an key chance/choice/tackle/pass success rate above 85%
 
Still absolutely no justification for speaking to and treating officials like ****.

I bet the vast majority of players don't have an key chance/choice/tackle/pass success rate above 85%
I remember once when I questioned a ref on one of his decisions. He responded by saying "If I ever made as many mistakes as you do in a game lad, I'd never be asked to put a pair of boots on again !"