Before June 2008 Robbie Keane was seen as a Spurs Legend in the making.
He scored some cracking goals in his 100 plus total and having joined us when we were truly **** had helped us up to being a top 5 side. He Lifted the Carling cup with Ledley and had tears in his eyes as we won the final ... he had formed a fantastic partnership with Berbatov too.
Robbie signed a new contract after the 2008 final win over Chelsea saying that he wanted to finish his career with us.
Then in a heart beat he demanded to join liverpool ... his boyhood club! who he joined for £21m in June 2008...and was forced to endure a terrible 6 month visit to merseyside. When he returned in Jan 2009 for £14m he played well until the following December (he was a big part of us going from bottom 4 to 8th in the league in the last part of the 08/09 season...and he played well during the beginning of the 09/10 season ... he scored 4 in one match...he then fell out with Redknapp over a drinking trip to Ireland that xmas and was regularly sent out on loan to various clubs (Celtic; West Ham) until we sold him again for around £6m to LA Galaxy in 2011.
I was pleased for him last night to become the most capped ROI international ever and to get a hat trick ... he is also the ROI's record goal scorer
But I don't see him as a legend ... and don't think I ever will.
I think that a lot of spurs fans respect him and think he was a very good player but don't seem to feel too fondly about him.
My (very long winded) question is;
Does Robbie Keane deserve to be seen as a legend in the way that Ginola is? They both played for us when we were **** and both won the Carling cup with us and were both very good players...Ginola played for us for 3 or 4 years and keane played for us for 5 or 6 years. They both left to join other clubs. But to me Ginola is the one I think of most fondly!
He scored some cracking goals in his 100 plus total and having joined us when we were truly **** had helped us up to being a top 5 side. He Lifted the Carling cup with Ledley and had tears in his eyes as we won the final ... he had formed a fantastic partnership with Berbatov too.
Robbie signed a new contract after the 2008 final win over Chelsea saying that he wanted to finish his career with us.
Then in a heart beat he demanded to join liverpool ... his boyhood club! who he joined for £21m in June 2008...and was forced to endure a terrible 6 month visit to merseyside. When he returned in Jan 2009 for £14m he played well until the following December (he was a big part of us going from bottom 4 to 8th in the league in the last part of the 08/09 season...and he played well during the beginning of the 09/10 season ... he scored 4 in one match...he then fell out with Redknapp over a drinking trip to Ireland that xmas and was regularly sent out on loan to various clubs (Celtic; West Ham) until we sold him again for around £6m to LA Galaxy in 2011.
I was pleased for him last night to become the most capped ROI international ever and to get a hat trick ... he is also the ROI's record goal scorer
But I don't see him as a legend ... and don't think I ever will.
I think that a lot of spurs fans respect him and think he was a very good player but don't seem to feel too fondly about him.
My (very long winded) question is;
Does Robbie Keane deserve to be seen as a legend in the way that Ginola is? They both played for us when we were **** and both won the Carling cup with us and were both very good players...Ginola played for us for 3 or 4 years and keane played for us for 5 or 6 years. They both left to join other clubs. But to me Ginola is the one I think of most fondly!

