Rival Watch

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
shwan said:
every element helps, Rooney is England hero and white, Rio is just a defender and black
and tbh that is not my argument, i have been in UK for 9 years so don't have clues how things going on here but that is what people in work were telling me, is not like am inventing something new .. and tbh from watching FA treatment to Rooney, am starting to believe them
Click to expand...

It patently IS your argument, as that's the only difference between them! They both play for England & United, they're both well respected players, the only difference is one is white & the other black, so if you're saying there's FA bias then by definition you're saying it's racist <doh>

You really need to think before you type man, your arguments make little sense, & have more holes than a Swiss cheese, try thinking about the issue in greater depth before spouting off about bias in the English game.
 
Tobes said:
Bitter? Loser?

Who the **** are you like?

I stopped responding to your posts previously, as your points were inane & repetitive, that viewed everything from a simplistic, one eyed, docile, standpoint imo.

I therefore placed you in the 'not worth my time' envelope, this view was validated when I saw some of your 'own' viewed you in the same way i.e. a total twonk.
Click to expand...

Is that you Brendan ?
 
Tobes said:
It patently IS your argument, as that's the only difference between them! They both play for England & United, they're both well respected players, the only difference is one is white & the other black, so if you're saying there's FA bias then by definition you're saying it's racist <doh>

You really need to think before you type man, your arguments make little sense, & have more holes than a Swiss cheese, try thinking about the issue in greater depth before spouting off about bias in the English game.
Click to expand...
am not an expert on how people thinks here .. am just passing what other British people told me about the culture, although have to admit people who told me this theory were black
 
2 English clubs among biggest 5 spenders till now in Europe
interestingly, if spurs sign Lamela , they will be 3rd ahead of City, Real spend so far £67m, but can jump to first by signing Bale, pushing their total spending to £160m !! FFP .. what FFP?

1) Monaco - Total: £126.7m
Signings: Falcao £52.8m, Rodriguez £39.6m, Moutinho £22m, Toulalan £4.4m, Martial £4.4m, Isimat-Mirin £3.5m
2) Manchester City - Total: £97.6m
Signings: Fernandinho £35.2m, Jovetic £22.8m, Negredo £22m, Navas £17.6m
3) Paris Saint-Germain - Total: £96m
Signings: Cavani £56.7m, Marquinos £27.6m, Digne £13.2m
4) Tottenham - Total: £90.4m
Signings: Willian £30m, Soldado £26.4m, Paulinho £17.3m, Capoue £9.6m, Chadli £7.1m
5) Napoli - Total: £68.8m
Signings: Higuain £32.5m, Albiol £10.5m, Mertens £8.5m, Callejon £8.3m, Rafael £4.4m, Armero £3.5m, Calaio £1.1m

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/tottenham-transfers-erik-lamela-signing-2206113
 
shwan said:
2 English clubs among biggest 5 spenders till now in Europe
interestingly, if spurs sign Lamela , they will be 3rd ahead of City, Real spend so far £67m, but can jump to first by signing Bale, pushing their total spending to £160m !! FFP .. what FFP?

1) Monaco - Total: £126.7m
Signings: Falcao £52.8m, Rodriguez £39.6m, Moutinho £22m, Toulalan £4.4m, Martial £4.4m, Isimat-Mirin £3.5m
2) Manchester City - Total: £97.6m
Signings: Fernandinho £35.2m, Jovetic £22.8m, Negredo £22m, Navas £17.6m
3) Paris Saint-Germain - Total: £96m
Signings: Cavani £56.7m, Marquinos £27.6m, Digne £13.2m
4) Tottenham - Total: £90.4m
Signings: Willian £30m, Soldado £26.4m, Paulinho £17.3m, Capoue £9.6m, Chadli £7.1m
5) Napoli - Total: £68.8m
Signings: Higuain £32.5m, Albiol £10.5m, Mertens £8.5m, Callejon £8.3m, Rafael £4.4m, Armero £3.5m, Calaio £1.1m

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/tottenham-transfers-erik-lamela-signing-2206113
Click to expand...

I can't see Arsenal on that list...;)
 
shwan said:
2 English clubs among biggest 5 spenders till now in Europe
interestingly, if spurs sign Lamela , they will be 3rd ahead of City, Real spend so far £67m, but can jump to first by signing Bale, pushing their total spending to £160m !! FFP .. what FFP?

1) Monaco - Total: £126.7m
Signings: Falcao £52.8m, Rodriguez £39.6m, Moutinho £22m, Toulalan £4.4m, Martial £4.4m, Isimat-Mirin £3.5m
2) Manchester City - Total: £97.6m
Signings: Fernandinho £35.2m, Jovetic £22.8m, Negredo £22m, Navas £17.6m
3) Paris Saint-Germain - Total: £96m
Signings: Cavani £56.7m, Marquinos £27.6m, Digne £13.2m
4) Tottenham - Total: £90.4m
Signings: Willian £30m, Soldado £26.4m, Paulinho £17.3m, Capoue £9.6m, Chadli £7.1m
5) Napoli - Total: £68.8m
Signings: Higuain £32.5m, Albiol £10.5m, Mertens £8.5m, Callejon £8.3m, Rafael £4.4m, Armero £3.5m, Calaio £1.1m

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/tottenham-transfers-erik-lamela-signing-2206113
Click to expand...

Those figures mean nothing really, it's the net spend figure that's the relevant one, as Spurs are on the verge of taking their net spend back to zero!
 
chelsea - over 100 years of history said:
I can't see Arsenal on that list...;)
Click to expand...
yeahh .. that so called £70m AW was supposed to spend <laugh>

Tobes said:
Those figures mean nothing really, it's the net spend figure that's the relevant one, as Spurs are on the verge of taking their net spend back to zero!
Click to expand...
you have a point , thanks to Real generosity, I think spurs look much more stronger now and more as a team
we can take out Napoli too from the list

meanwhile one things is certain , all those money around has inflated some player prices with clubs started to asking for same amount of money for their world class players
 
shwan said:
yeahh .. that so called £70m AW was supposed to spend <laugh>


you have a point , thanks to Real generosity, I think spurs look much more stronger now and more as a team
we can take out Napoli too from the list

meanwhile one things is certain , all those money around has inflated some player prices with clubs started to asking for same amount of money for their world class players
Click to expand...


I think Bale will fail in Madrid, but I may be wrong
 
Tobes said:
Those figures mean nothing really, it's the net spend figure that's the relevant one, as Spurs are on the verge of taking their net spend back to zero!
Click to expand...

ROFLMAO, you have to be a Scouser right?
They are obsessed with net spend!!
 
Tobes said:
No idea what's amusing about that, it's a simple fact. Gross spend means **** all
Click to expand...

Chavs don't like the concept of net spend as they're still intent on convincing people that their improvement under Roman has had little to do with him spunking money like P Diddy in a whore house.
 
Tobes said:
No idea what's amusing about that, it's a simple fact. Gross spend means **** all
Click to expand...

Sorry Tobes but net spend means **** all. if you buy a player for 10 mil and sell a player for 5 mil the new player has not cost you 5 mil, he has cost you 5 mil cash + a 5 mil assett which in anyones book still equals 10 mil.
 
Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich has telephoned Anzhi Makhachkala owner Suleyman Kerimov to offer £32m for winger Willian, 25, in an attempt to prevent the Brazilian joining Tottenham.

Full story: Daily Mirror
Click to expand...
don't Chelsea need a striker? or it is just a matter of sabotaging Spurs move ? or may be they simply want to find a replacement for Mata <whistle> hahaha
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back