Good. As long as he plays Mata I'm happy. Just hope the fckr isnt injured (i bet u got your fingers crossed there)
Rival Watch
- Thread starter Style
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Good. As long as he plays Mata I'm happy. Just hope the fckr isnt injured (i bet u got your fingers crossed there)
The only thing I hope for against Man Utd is the officials to get decisions right. I'm never [HASHTAG]#worried[/HASHTAG] about a fair fight against you
The guy that sat Rivaldo (best player in world at the time) on the bench because he said he wouldn`t play on the left? I think names and cost mean little to van Gaal
Astro is genuinely worried. Di Maria, Mata, Herrera, Carrick, Rooney, Young, even Fellaini - bet he's dreaming about them all for the next 6 nights.
Went straight down the tunnel when he came off but not mentioned any injury on his blog
The guy that sat Rivaldo (best player in world at the time) on the bench because he said he wouldn`t play on the left? I think names and cost mean little to van Gaal
Mate that was the last millennium when Van Gaal was a decent manager and actually had a [HASHTAG]#philosophy[/HASHTAG] rather than just constantly mouthing off about it
Getting your excuses in early
I've seen your performances over the last couple of games and I'm not worried either. Bring it on.
He still only picks the players he thinks can do the job so, philosophy or not, the name/price makes no difference.
Hard to see him making too many changes....Blind (v Sterling) is not the quickest at left-back but bringing Rojo in would mean a reshuffle ...if he plays Di Maria (for Herrera) he's likely to be out of position again
It is amazing how managers and commentators and pundits cannot do the maths as far as working out how many goals are required and what a certain score line means. Monaco have absolutely NO need to score. In fact they scoring one goal will have minimal effect on what Arsenal need to do. To go through Arsenal need to score 3 goals. They score fewer and they are out. Monaco should just prevent Arsenal from scoring.
Pellegrini didn't work it out last season when he could have gone top by just scoring one more goal. Yet they played as if they didn't realise what they could have achieved. Same this season, when Cahill scored, that BBC RS supporting muppet Alan Green screamed: "Chelsea are through", not realising that it didnt make a jot of difference to PSG who needed to score to remain in the competition.
Probably because of the angle.
Do you not think its actually YOU who wax ***gotal because you dont like heaping praise on a team you have a rivalry with?....maybe?
Probably because of the angle.
Do you not think its actually YOU who wax ***gotal because you dont like heaping praise on a team you have a rivalry with?....maybe?
Nah I've never liked Townsend's commentary. He's so bias it's offensive.
The angle meant little from that distance. The irony is he actually fcked up his original finish and got lucky with the rebound.
I know mate, am just funning
Wasnt all that impressive at all to be honest, and like you say, he only needed the second chance because he ****ed up the first.
I know mate, am just funning
Wasnt all that impressive at all to be honest, and like you say, he only needed the second chance because he ****ed up the first.
Sanchez is quality btw....just to prove my unfaggotness