The obvious connections between their owners and the Tories is rather problematic, though.What sort of 'punishment' could they possibly hope to implement though? The agreement was made with the full approval of the Assembly and Mayor's Office. Unless something was done that is revealed to have been illegal, I don't see how what or why West Ham can be punished for it. If anything, the Olympic Committee and L.A did more wrong as in their haste to shift an embarrassing white elephant standing in silent testimony against the true enemy of the taxpayer - the Olympic Games themselves held during times of austerity - that they simply cut as many corners as possible in their haste to get the deal done. As much as I loath them, the Porn brothers and Brady were only ever acting on the best interests of their club, and rightfully so. It is the local authority's responsibility to protect the taxpayer, not a poor man's Peter Stringfellow.
I highly doubt anything illegal was done; Levy would've been all over it like a rash. Unfortunately, you cannot punish something that was unfair. If someone cuts you off on the road, there's nothing you can do about it unless it can be proven that they did so because they were under the influence. The OS deal stank of unfairness from day 1. Maybe there's more to it though...
They've literally given money to the people that have handed them a publicly funded stadium.
So did Peter Stringfellow, now that you mention him!


