2 points dropped for Liverpool...
Great job Villa![]()

I know that annoyed me as well YV. Petrov bottled it. He should have said it was a blatant dive. I would love to have seen the look on Redknapp's face if he had.
I knew 100% he would say it was a penalty.
Will this see Benteke back to form as he was superb last year, started the season in superb form. Gets injured and struggles.
Was he over rated or genuine class? Be good to see him return or he could be another inconsistent Belgium player!
I've just left a message on the Mouser thread. I feel sullied, soiled, sickened, but Goofy's latest antics. Even Steve Nicol, on TalkSport tonight, said it was a dive.
The only good that will come out of this is that the ref, when he looks back at the footage, and sees how he's been made to look a complete and utter clown, will never again give Goofy the benefit of the doubt.
A black day for football.
Suarez has what every top footballer has in today's game, a natural reaction to view being touched as a trigger to force their body to the ground or if they have the opportunity to invent being tackled then it's because the player from the opposition dared to try and win the ball!
It's pathetic and a form of cheating but virtually every top player is at it.
As I've already said, a video ref could quickly end this problem. Firstly if a player isn't impeded sufficiently to make him fall to ground he should receive a yellow card (even if a foul is given in his favour). If there is no significant contact and the forward goes to ground and appeals, the colour of the card should be red.
The idea of 'impeded sufficiently' is very very ambiguous as well, remember when Bale was going down with minimal contact last year and the view was that he was so quick that the slightest contact at full pace could send him down? The idea of a purely anti-simulation video ref is a good one but there would undoubtedly be problems and potentially inconsistencies as different officials would see things slightly differently.
In a poll on MOTD ,most people said he didn't dive,wonder if it was just mouser's that voted
Impeded sufficiently could be a little ambiguous, however, when things are black and white it leaves no room for interpretation. There would be inconsistencies but it would move the balance away from cheaters like Suarez, Bale on occasions and even Townsend. The problem is that seeing the likes of Suarez and Bale doing it, young players see it as the way to go. It needs to be cut out.
It has been around for far too long, my old granddad used to criticise Rodney Marsh for going to ground far too easily. Bale always said that he had the right to go to ground if he had been touched. IMHO that is totally wrong. Football used to be a contact sport. A foul shouldn't be given unless a player is impeded. A touch is not enough otherwise every time a keeper comes for a ball in his area and touches an opponent whilst catching a ball a penalty would be give as well. That would be crazy. Simulation is worse than committing a foul because it is fraud.