Rival watch

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Didn't see the game, but I did catch Adli's ridiculous dive against the filth.
They've got the power to ban him and they should, but they won't.
Absolutely laughable attempt at... something.
 
When you look back and consider what followed, he wasn’t all that bad. But I’d prefer Glasner or Emery (not Dick).

Emery would be nuts to leave Villa for old Trafford right now even though Utd are a bigger club

Glasner’s style wouldn’t be the Man Utd way and it could end up like Thomas Frank at Spurs with some fans not happy with the style
 
Emery would be nuts to leave Villa for old Trafford right now even though Utd are a bigger club

Glasner’s style wouldn’t be the Man Utd way and it could end up like Thomas Frank at Spurs with some fans not happy with the style
The problem is that if Utd are going to appoint a coach, the options are limited. But if there is a change of policy (unlikely I concede), then either of these would be capable of taking on the challenge.
I fear that the division of all the various roles creates conflict and differences in approach which ultimately makes the system dysfunctional.
SAF was in charge; he coached the players, he had the final say with recruitment, he oversaw the youth system and he knew and worked with all the the staff from the club's hierarchy to the tea ladies - even if he delegated many of the tasks within that to people he trusted. The current philosophy doesn't work and never will. The manager needs to be autonomous.
 
The problem is that if Utd are going to appoint a coach, the options are limited. But if there is a change of policy (unlikely I concede), then either of these would be capable of taking on the challenge.
I fear that the division of all the various roles creates conflict and differences in approach which ultimately makes the system dysfunctional.
SAF was in charge; he coached the players, he had the final say with recruitment, he oversaw the youth system and he knew and worked with all the the staff from the club's hierarchy to the tea ladies - even if he delegated many of the tasks within that to people he trusted. The current philosophy doesn't work and never will. The manager needs to be autonomous.
I think the real issue is which managers want to work for free

Because that seems to be the priority with Jim Ratfink's approach to paying people
 
Am I losing my mind here?

West Ham fans were fuming that the penalty was given.
They think it's a 'coming together' and that Gibbs-White was never getting the ball anyway.

Be that as it may, it's a clear penalty IMO.

Areola comes to palm the ball away, gets nowhere near it and ends up whacking Gibbs-White in the face. Penalty.
Not sure what the fuss is about...

If anything, they should be more annoyed with their player for being so clumsy rather than VAR intervening.
 

Am I losing my mind here?

West Ham fans were fuming that the penalty was given.
They think it's a 'coming together' and that Gibbs-White was never getting the ball anyway.

Be that as it may, it's a clear penalty IMO.

Areola comes to palm the ball away, gets nowhere near it and ends up whacking Gibbs-White in the face. Penalty.
Not sure what the fuss is about...

If anything, they should be more annoyed with their player for being so clumsy rather than VAR intervening.
Agree with you. Some on the Prem think it’s not a penalty but I don’t see how it’s not as he took out MGW without touching the ball
 
  • Like
Reactions: BinghamSpur
Agree with you. Some on the Prem think it’s not a penalty but I don’t see how it’s not as he took out MGW without touching the ball

All I'm seeing on social media (primarily 'X') is West Ham fans raging at the officials and the 'softness' of the penalty.

Areola as the defending player doesn't play the ball and takes out the attacking player. Since when was that not a penalty?

It's just a very weird thing to be so annoyed about.
Especially when they played like crap that second half.

West Ham are 7 points off safety. It is looking ominous for them.

I still wouldn't say it's 100% over yet - as there's a couple of teams above them who I don't fully trust - but they're in serious danger now.