And yet if you look on Twitter, all you see is one Runner after another screaming that Anthony Taylor was trying to cost them the game...You must log in or register to see images
And yet if you look on Twitter, all you see is one Runner after another screaming that Anthony Taylor was trying to cost them the game...You must log in or register to see images
Fred came on as a sub and should've been off within about 8 minutes.What? I was listening to Talkshite earlier on my walk back from town and they were saying that he is the second coming, or something like that. Personally I'm thinking it's easier to be a midfield destroyer if you don't get yellow cards when you do your destroying bit. Have to admit I haven't seen it but the BBC reports Lopetegui's annoyance that he didn't get a deserved second yellow in the match. But yellow cards are important. More subtle than not awarding or awarding penalties for favoured teams and similar VAR calls, but just as important. If certain teams can keep on doing yellow card challenges and not getting them it gives them a major advantage. Citeh do it all the time. Funnily enough never mentioned on Talkshite and similar, and certainly not mentioned in their earlier "analysis" of the player.
CK, don’t be obtuse. It didn’t get spotted in real time - which happens frequently as you well know - and then on replay, Mitoma was clearly offside in the build-up as seen on the footage.
You’re talking as if it was some extremely tight, marginal, split-hair call when it wasn’t.
You must log in or register to see images
I haven't seen it, but that looks... off, to me.
The timing of the Brighton player playing the ball seems questionable, for a start. Is it with his thigh?
The most obvious issue though is that the blue line goes through the defender's foot.
It's really clear. That's supposed to indicate how far back he is. It doesn't.
There's also the peculiar implication that being offside with your back to goal and moving away from goal toward the ball so that the defender is actually nearer to both the ball and the goal at time of play is still considered advantageous to the attacking player.
You must log in or register to see images
I haven't seen it, but that looks... off, to me.
The timing of the Brighton player playing the ball seems questionable, for a start. Is it with his thigh?
The most obvious issue though is that the blue line goes through the defender's foot.
It's really clear. That's supposed to indicate how far back he is. It doesn't.
I agree the lines are dubious, and again, not the first time this has happened, but if you zoom in on that image, to me, it looks clear that Mitoma’s back foot is ahead of Tomiyasu’s. Even that red line doesn’t look completely straight either.
I actually agree with you here and think that it was harsh on Brighton that it was disallowed. Frankly, with how badly we managed the game in the final 20 minutes, I wouldn’t have whinged too much if it did stand as we completely lost our nerve.
But, like you say, rules and rules and Mitoma’s backfoot is keeping him offside. Whether that materially impacts the game, or gives him an advantage, is certainly questionable. But that never seems to be taken into consideration now or how VAR is being used. There’s been other decisions identical to that in the past.
It's a really weird quirk of the offside rule that I only realised due to my anger at you winning the league
. I know this is off-topic from what we've been discussing, but judging by previous comments, you seem adamant that we're going to win the league. I get the concern, but I wouldn't be at panic stations just yet. There's still 22 league games left, we have a small-ish squad - who are very inexperienced at being in this situation - and we need to consider how we fare in other competitions, as well as managing injuries, workload etc.not been called obtuse since secondary school
A lot of it has to do with the Dutch in particular having a knack for strikers being in offside positions, only to run onside just in the nick of time when the ball was played to game an advanbtageIt's a really weird quirk of the offside rule that I only realised due to my anger at you winning the league sharpening my focus. It makes almost zero sense.
Imagine Haaland starts a phase of play with his back to goal and 10 yards offside. A team mate balloons a clearance into the air around the halfway line and the opposition for whatever reason let it bounce and then one of them slips. Meanwhile Haaland gets to it first because he's Frankenstein. Is that offside?
Technically, yes. But it is obvious that the real 'advantage' came from the fact that the opposition screwed up, and Haaland is built like a freak. If anything, him being offside was a disadvantage as it meant he had an extra 10 yards to cover in order to get to the ball first.
It's a bloody ridiculous rule.
A lot of it has to do with the Dutch in particular having a knack for strikers being in offside positions, only to run onside just in the nick of time when the ball was played to game an advanbtage
Both van Nistelrooy and van Persie were absolute bastards for getting that right, at both club and international level
I think it's very hard to tell because their feet aren't at the same height off the ground.I agree the lines are dubious, and again, not the first time this has happened, but if you zoom in on that image, to me, it looks clear that Mitoma’s back foot is ahead of Tomiyasu’s. Even that red line doesn’t look completely straight either.
Run out of gas 2nd half, it`s all Varpool.Brentford absolutely blitzed Liverpool that half. Had two disallowed, scored two and could have had another. Liverpool’s defence and midfield are so porous. Too easy to play through. Brentford won all the duels and were outmuscling them in all areas. They’ve become uncharacteristically poor at defending from set-plays too.
Fair play to Brentford, though. Let’s see if they run out of gas like they did against Spurs or if they have enough to win this.
Run out of gas 2nd half, it`s all Varpool.