Rival watch

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
What? I was listening to Talkshite earlier on my walk back from town and they were saying that he is the second coming, or something like that. Personally I'm thinking it's easier to be a midfield destroyer if you don't get yellow cards when you do your destroying bit. Have to admit I haven't seen it but the BBC reports Lopetegui's annoyance that he didn't get a deserved second yellow in the match. But yellow cards are important. More subtle than not awarding or awarding penalties for favoured teams and similar VAR calls, but just as important. If certain teams can keep on doing yellow card challenges and not getting them it gives them a major advantage. Citeh do it all the time. Funnily enough never mentioned on Talkshite and similar, and certainly not mentioned in their earlier "analysis" of the player.
Fred came on as a sub and should've been off within about 8 minutes.
Injured one player, then blatantly hacked down another. Ludicrous stuff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Billy The Spur
CK, don’t be obtuse. It didn’t get spotted in real time - which happens frequently as you well know - and then on replay, Mitoma was clearly offside in the build-up as seen on the footage.

You’re talking as if it was some extremely tight, marginal, split-hair call when it wasn’t.
You must log in or register to see images


I haven't seen it, but that looks... off, to me.
The timing of the Brighton player playing the ball seems questionable, for a start. Is it with his thigh?
The most obvious issue though is that the blue line goes through the defender's foot.
It's really clear. That's supposed to indicate how far back he is. It doesn't.
 
You must log in or register to see images


I haven't seen it, but that looks... off, to me.
The timing of the Brighton player playing the ball seems questionable, for a start. Is it with his thigh?
The most obvious issue though is that the blue line goes through the defender's foot.
It's really clear. That's supposed to indicate how far back he is. It doesn't.

There's also the peculiar implication that being offside with your back to goal and moving away from goal toward the ball so that the defender is actually nearer to both the ball and the goal at time of play is still considered advantageous to the attacking player.

I know it's 'the law' but it struck me as totally counterintuitive if not ironic that Mitoma being marginally offside actually meant it was harder for him to get to the knock-on than it would have been had been a yard onside. Not his fault the defender was asleep.

Anyway PNP stop being so obtuse.
 
There's also the peculiar implication that being offside with your back to goal and moving away from goal toward the ball so that the defender is actually nearer to both the ball and the goal at time of play is still considered advantageous to the attacking player.

I actually agree with you here and think that it was harsh on Brighton that it was disallowed. Frankly, with how badly we managed the game in the final 20 minutes, I wouldn’t have whinged too much if it did stand as we completely lost our nerve.

But, like you say, rules and rules and Mitoma’s backfoot is keeping him offside. Whether that materially impacts the game, or gives him an advantage, is certainly questionable. But that never seems to be taken into consideration now or how VAR is being used. There’s been other decisions identical to that in the past.
 
You must log in or register to see images


I haven't seen it, but that looks... off, to me.
The timing of the Brighton player playing the ball seems questionable, for a start. Is it with his thigh?
The most obvious issue though is that the blue line goes through the defender's foot.
It's really clear. That's supposed to indicate how far back he is. It doesn't.

I agree the lines are dubious, and again, not the first time this has happened, but if you zoom in on that image, to me, it looks clear that Mitoma’s back foot is ahead of Tomiyasu’s. Even that red line doesn’t look completely straight either.
 
I agree the lines are dubious, and again, not the first time this has happened, but if you zoom in on that image, to me, it looks clear that Mitoma’s back foot is ahead of Tomiyasu’s. Even that red line doesn’t look completely straight either.

< stop being so obtuse >
 
I actually agree with you here and think that it was harsh on Brighton that it was disallowed. Frankly, with how badly we managed the game in the final 20 minutes, I wouldn’t have whinged too much if it did stand as we completely lost our nerve.

But, like you say, rules and rules and Mitoma’s backfoot is keeping him offside. Whether that materially impacts the game, or gives him an advantage, is certainly questionable. But that never seems to be taken into consideration now or how VAR is being used. There’s been other decisions identical to that in the past.

It's a really weird quirk of the offside rule that I only realised due to my anger at you winning the league sharpening my focus. It makes almost zero sense.

Imagine Haaland starts a phase of play with his back to goal and 10 yards offside. A team mate balloons a clearance into the air around the halfway line and the opposition for whatever reason let it bounce and then one of them slips. Meanwhile Haaland gets to it first because he's Frankenstein. Is that offside?

Technically, yes. But it is obvious that the real 'advantage' came from the fact that the opposition screwed up, and Haaland is built like a freak. If anything, him being offside was a disadvantage as it meant he had an extra 10 yards to cover in order to get to the ball first.

It's a bloody ridiculous rule.
 
It's a really weird quirk of the offside rule that I only realised due to my anger at you winning the league

Erm...think you need to slow down there buckeroo <laugh>. I know this is off-topic from what we've been discussing, but judging by previous comments, you seem adamant that we're going to win the league. I get the concern, but I wouldn't be at panic stations just yet. There's still 22 league games left, we have a small-ish squad - who are very inexperienced at being in this situation - and we need to consider how we fare in other competitions, as well as managing injuries, workload etc.

My target at the start of the season was top-4 and a trophy (which I didn't think we'd get anyway but was hopeful) and I still maintain that's our target.

When City have won 4 of the last 5 leagues, have experience in overturning worse deficits than this, and can bring on the likes of Foden, Alvarez, Cancelo and Gundogan off their bench, it's hard to look past them winning it again.

We've put ourselves in a great position to secure top-4, but the league is not something I can realistically consider at this point in time because I know how City are a freak of nature.
 
It's a really weird quirk of the offside rule that I only realised due to my anger at you winning the league sharpening my focus. It makes almost zero sense.

Imagine Haaland starts a phase of play with his back to goal and 10 yards offside. A team mate balloons a clearance into the air around the halfway line and the opposition for whatever reason let it bounce and then one of them slips. Meanwhile Haaland gets to it first because he's Frankenstein. Is that offside?

Technically, yes. But it is obvious that the real 'advantage' came from the fact that the opposition screwed up, and Haaland is built like a freak. If anything, him being offside was a disadvantage as it meant he had an extra 10 yards to cover in order to get to the ball first.

It's a bloody ridiculous rule.
A lot of it has to do with the Dutch in particular having a knack for strikers being in offside positions, only to run onside just in the nick of time when the ball was played to game an advanbtage

Both van Nistelrooy and van Persie were absolute bastards for getting that right, at both club and international level
 
A lot of it has to do with the Dutch in particular having a knack for strikers being in offside positions, only to run onside just in the nick of time when the ball was played to game an advanbtage

Both van Nistelrooy and van Persie were absolute bastards for getting that right, at both club and international level

There's still no comparison though as fundamentally the phase of play you're describing will involve a forward pass or a ball crossed into a more dangerous area. Those salient points are crucial as the offside rule as it is only really takes into consideration lateral/medial distance to goal as if it were an objective advantage in every single scenario, I.e the ball itself is treated as irrelevant.

What I'm describing is a player moving further away from goal towards a ball played either backwards or sideways (i.e. neither the player nor the ball are moving into a more dangerous position). The Law will still flag that as offside, even though the evidence in front of us is clear: an attacker moving away from goal from an offside position toward a ball also moving away from or neutral to the goal is demonstrably at a disadvantage as a result of starting in an offside position, yet it is still illegal for them to benefit from superior fitness and/or a sleeping defence.

The Law is entirely counter-intuitive.
 
I agree the lines are dubious, and again, not the first time this has happened, but if you zoom in on that image, to me, it looks clear that Mitoma’s back foot is ahead of Tomiyasu’s. Even that red line doesn’t look completely straight either.
I think it's very hard to tell because their feet aren't at the same height off the ground.
 
  • Like
Reactions: humanbeingincroydon
"...and now,the end is near......." .Some kind of nightmare this. Arsenal walking away at the top.....and Spurs going for walkies towards the bottom. We do have a team and a manager.....don't we? Answers on a returned season ticket please!!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock
Brentford absolutely blitzed Liverpool that half. Had two disallowed, scored two and could have had another. Liverpool’s defence and midfield are so porous. Too easy to play through. Brentford won all the duels and were outmuscling them in all areas. They’ve become uncharacteristically poor at defending from set-plays too.

Fair play to Brentford, though. Let’s see if they run out of gas like they did against Spurs or if they have enough to win this.
 
Brentford absolutely blitzed Liverpool that half. Had two disallowed, scored two and could have had another. Liverpool’s defence and midfield are so porous. Too easy to play through. Brentford won all the duels and were outmuscling them in all areas. They’ve become uncharacteristically poor at defending from set-plays too.

Fair play to Brentford, though. Let’s see if they run out of gas like they did against Spurs or if they have enough to win this.
Run out of gas 2nd half, it`s all Varpool.
 
Run out of gas 2nd half, it`s all Varpool.

Konate with a defensive howler to allow Mbuemo to score the 3rd. To be fair to Brentford, I thought they stemmed the tide pretty well after Oxlade-Chamberlain scored.

I’m glad that the officials haven’t given into Liverpool’s incessant whining and complaining, though. Makes a change!