Dunno mate stopped watching football about a month ago
Come on bro, chin up not like you got Jose managing yous.
I only tune in for the pens mate. Bit gutted when we only get the one.

Dunno mate stopped watching football about a month ago

Funny dele pic on the GM thread.Come on bro, chin up not like you got Jose managing yous.
I only tune in for the pens mate. Bit gutted when we only get the one.![]()

I still haven't seen it, but I assume that the implication of this is that Martial dived.So Bednarek's red card v ManU has been overturned. Right decision but I'm kind of surprised they did it, you know, doing the right thing. Well actually the right thing would be not to send him off in the first place, and possibly give a yellow card to Martial for diving. But that would never happen. The fact that it directly and indirectly contributed a few goals to ManU's goal difference is no doubt irrelevant, and the fact that it casts doubts over this refs competence (I can't bring myself to say the name) is also of course irrelevant. He gave a pen, was told to go to the monitor, and instead of thinking the decision might be wrong he instead sent off the Southampton player. But don't worry, he would have done exactly the same thing had the situation been reversed and a ManU player not fouled a diving Southampton player.
The "implication" (or actual reasoning i would think) is that Martial had lost control of the ball therefore no denial of goal scoring opportunityI still haven't seen it, but I assume that the implication of this is that Martial dived.
If that's the case, then why isn't he being banned, like Niasse was a few years ago?

As it's you answering, I'm going to assume that this is wrong.The "implication" (or actual reasoning i would think) is that Martial had lost control of the ball therefore no denial of goal scoring opportunity![]()
I think the inference is that it was an accidental collision.I still haven't seen it, but I assume that the implication of this is that Martial dived.
If that's the case, then why isn't he being banned, like Niasse was a few years ago?
Luiz made accidental contact and his ban was upheld. Not very consistent.I think the inference is that it was an accidental collision.
There was clearly contact, which caused Martial, who was running at speed, to fall.
Bednarek went to make a challenge, tried to pull out when he realises he can't get the ball and will take out the man, but still made contact.
He has been given the benefit it being deemed accidental, which is generous.
Consistency is a different issue altogether!Luiz made accidental contact and his ban was upheld. Not very consistent.
Consistency is a different issue altogether!
One of the many problems with VAR is that it distorts perspective. Watching images from mutiple cameras in slow motion creates a misleading impression of how an event happened in real time. Physical contact of this kind happens in a fraction of a second. In slo-mo, a false impression is created that a player (Bednarek) has time to make a decision e,g to pull out of a tackle, when in reality he has acted instinctively and had very little time to readjust.
It's the same with handballs. Things can look deliberate in slo-mo, as if the raising of an arm into the path of the ball was intended to block it, when, at full speed, it's apparent a player is simply gaining leverage.
Funny dele pic on the GM thread.
Dele after the game "just lump it forwards and fuking defend"![]()
dark meme that mate.As it's you answering, I'm going to assume that this is wrong.

You'd think it appearing in an Amazon doc would have been his first clueSucky thinks that Alli quote was after our last game and Trebs buys it hook line n sinker
You must log in or register to see images
A couple of things which illustrate a massive problem with the Laws at least in my opinion. A few minutes ago Xhaka blatantly and deliberately badly fouls Grealish to stop a breakaway. Gets a yellow card and concedes a free kick neither of which affect anything.
In our match Dier slightly mistimes a kick on the ball in the penalty area and that effectively hands the opposition a goal.
No argument with either decision under the current Law. But wouldn't the game be much fairer if any deliberate foul was a penalty and a mistimed challenge never was?
Why?