Calling someone a "mascot" who has been " bum rimming the absolute rectum" out of people isn't insulting? Give it a ****ing rest.Whatever mod deleted my post laughing at little LUKE, gave the reason "no insults"..... Yet none were used in my post.
Any chance of some clarification on that please?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/55922560
More of this, please. Much more. So necessary. I admired Dean Smith standing his ground against Jonathan Moss' incompetence and now Hasenhutll is doing the same with Dean and Mason - the PGMOL's answer to Laurel and Hardy.
The more clubs that openly call out the abysmal officials charged with making multi-million pound decisions week in week out, the better. Take the slap on the wrist, take the fine, even take the touchline ban if needs be. Until everyone gets in on it, nothing will change and the referee's cartel will continue looking after its own. I hope Arteta chimes in too about Craig Pawson - another absolute clown.
If a footballer has a string of bad displays, they are (usually) dropped. If a manager has a bad run of performances, chances are that they lose their jobs.
If referees make consistently bad decisions, they are immune from culpability and carry on like nothing has happened.
The IFAB, FA and PGMOL need to get their ****ing act together because they are doing everything they can to absolve themselves of responsibility, their implementation of VAR (which I, in principle, advocate) has been a total farce, their tinkering of the football rules are outrageous and the standards of current officials are simply not good enough. I don't know what all the criteria or requirements are to be a Premier League referee, but if Craig Pawson, Lee Mason, Stuart Atwell and Jon Moss can all be referees, then I may as well put in an application too - I'd love to be **** at my job and get paid close to 6 figures a year with unrivalled job security.
You're not Northern and you admit that you support a Premier League club. No ****ing chance!If a footballer has a string of bad displays, they are (usually) dropped. If a manager has a bad run of performances, chances are that they lose their jobs.
If referees make consistently bad decisions, they are immune from culpability and carry on like nothing has happened.
The IFAB, FA and PGMOL need to get their ****ing act together because they are doing everything they can to absolve themselves of responsibility; the implementation of VAR (which I, in principle, advocate) has been a total farce, their tinkering of the football rules are outrageous and the standards of current officials are simply not good enough. I don't know what all the criteria or requirements are to be a Premier League referee, but if Craig Pawson, Lee Mason, Stuart Atwell, Mike Dean and Jon Moss can all be referees, then I may as well put in an application too - I'd love to be **** at my job and get paid close to 6 figures a year with unrivalled job security.

You're not Northern and you admit that you support a Premier League club. No ****ing chance!![]()

I was born in Leicester - that's North enough, isn't it?![]()
Typical bloody Gooner!I was born in Leicester - that's North enough, isn't it?![]()

If a footballer has a string of bad displays, they are (usually) dropped. If a manager has a bad run of performances, chances are that they lose their jobs.
If referees make consistently bad decisions, they are immune from culpability and carry on like nothing has happened.
The IFAB, FA and PGMOL need to get their ****ing act together because they are doing everything they can to absolve themselves of responsibility; the implementation of VAR (which I, in principle, advocate) has been a total farce, their tinkering of the football rules are outrageous and the standards of current officials are simply not good enough. I don't know what all the criteria or requirements are to be a Premier League referee, but if Craig Pawson, Lee Mason, Stuart Atwell, Mike Dean and Jon Moss can all be referees, then I may as well put in an application too - I'd love to be **** at my job and get paid close to 6 figures a year with unrivalled job security.
While I agree that referees need more oversight and accountability and should see some sort of consequence for their mistakes, I also think that an element of caution needs to be retained in how it’s done. Refereeing at any level is a largely thankless job and the abuse that one or two members of my family have had refereeing games at a junior level and senior women’s level is sobering to hear about.
The game can’t run without referees at any level and I think more needs to be done to promote talent up the ranks and get them qualified to ref higher-level games in order to have a viable talent pool to promote up the leagues in place of some of the sub-standard officials we see at the top of the game.
I’d also like to see a pan-European initiative where referees from other leagues independently review each other (not live obviously because that’s not feasible, but periodically throughout the season) in terms of performance, and to see referees interviewed on record after games in order to account for decisions. I also think the audio feed from referees, assistants, and the VAR should be included in broadcasts, as it is in rugby, so everyone can get a clearer understanding of how they are communicating between themselves and with players.
I think you've solved your own problem Huddle; it isn't necessarily a lack of quality/training/expertise - after all, PL-level referees usually come in with years and years of experience. And they are only human. As the game gets faster and modern technology is able to dissect every moment of a game in 4K and at 28 different angles with cameras that see quicker and clearer than the human eye, it is only inevitable that mistakes will be made more frequently and will be open to more scrutiny.
That, I can live with.
It's the current set-up that's killing the PGMOL. As Brunel said, in how many other industries can so much sustained crap be met with continued job security? Even when a ref is 'demoted' to the Championship, as Dean was in 2017, the 'punishment' tends to last no more than a week or two (i.e. until the newspapers and social media have moved on and the smoke has cleared) - it's the sporting equivalent of missing afternoon break because you set fire to the classroom before lunch. There is zero proportionality in the method and it also says to the Championship - whose clubs contribute £50k pa to the big pot of PL refs salaries - 'you're the detention room'. No. If a ref is too crap for the PL, he is too crap for any level elite sport, full stop and inflicting him on the Championship is as much of a punishment for them as it is for him. No. He can either go and officiate on the Hackney Marshes while completing a refresher/additional training course, or **** off home and get a new job.
As for the PGMOL itself, the whole thing is a cartel. From the fact that the executives are almost all former referees who made exactly the same mistakes as the ones they're meant to be criticising, to the fact that VAR is manned by other referees and no-one can hear a word being said between them. I don't know about you, but since that muppet Clattenburg came out with his 'narrative' after the Leicester season, I don't trust a word any of them says. Where is the transparency? Why are refereeing decisions conducted like some sort of state secret? Why is there such reluctance to admit error? Are we meant to believe that they are gods? The fact that not a single apology has ever been uttered by any of them despite the entire world seeing that a mistake was made, is what has led to the ridiculous situation where managers are openly insisting that they don't want to be reffed by certain officials ever again. If the PGMOL thinks this is less damaging to their image than offering a sincere, humble apology and admitting human error, they are beyond hope.
And then there are the competing interests at work within the PGMOL. It's a sordid, murky world. A plainly capitalist endeavour that bizarrely operates like a Trade Union. Try researching who actually funds the thing and pays the Select Group's wages. Good luck. From what I dug up, it appears to be a combination of clubs, the PL, the FA and various corporate sponsors (currently EA Sports). Who knows how many influences are at work there? The FA wants player development, the PL wants good TV, the clubs want promotion, the sponsors want drama.

You mean like this 'close call'?Of course there will still be close calls, but if you are offside by the metaphorical toe-nail in that scenario at least you will 'look offside' and you would have to be ahead of the last man for it to be given.
As for abolishing the rule thats an interesting thing to trial and see how teams react - legalised goal hanging maybe less of an issue in the top flight but maybe an issue in grass roots football.
Chris Foy. ****ing cyclist.You mean like this 'close call'?
You must log in or register to see media

But Chris Hoy got the abuse as I recall... lolChris Foy. ****ing cyclist.
Same ref for the utterly abysmal loss to Stoke, where he ****ed up absolutely everything and all in one direction.
Now a senior referees coach for the PGMOL. The prick.
Chris Foy. ****ing cyclist.
Same ref for the utterly abysmal loss to Stoke, where he ****ed up absolutely everything and all in one direction.
Now a senior referees coach for the PGMOL. The prick.
https://bleacherreport.com/articles/978363-tottenham-loses-3-vital-points-due-to-poor-officiatingOh crap, I'd forgotten about that Stoke match. After years of therapy you now remind me about it. It's not like it contains the worst decisions that have ever gone against us, but I don't think any game has ever had so many so wrong.
