Valencia take the lead against FC Tax-free Zona.
Lovely. Perhaps at least one ****ing result to cheer me up this weekend.
Lovely. Perhaps at least one ****ing result to cheer me up this weekend.
Rival watch
- Thread starter Spurlock
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Finished 1-1. The game was most memorable for a "Pedro Mendes" goal decision.Oh FFS
I'm off to kick a nun.
H
Hoddle is a god
Guest
Highly unlikely - he's not a big enough name for them I'd have thought. . And surely a Spurs fan would present this as dubious speculation, or even try to sound worried about it? We'll not sell anyone in January unless it suits us, we are not in that type of position. Eriksen will be looking forward to CL last 16 (can't play for Barca).
The BBC gossip column refers to the Eriksen to Barcelona in January rumour...might have thought about it if they had not written "Tottenham striker Eriksen..."
Romelu Lukaku has escaped a ban for an alleged kick on Brighton's Gaetan Bong, which is a player and not a nightclub, apparently:
This is why I don't think that VAR will actually change anything.
They'll use it to punish the Niasses of this world, not the Lukakus.
Any guess on the three refs on that panel? I'm going with Howard Webb, Mark Clattenburg and Alex Ferguson.
You must log in or register to see media
Alleged? This is why I don't think that VAR will actually change anything.They'll use it to punish the Niasses of this world, not the Lukakus.
Any guess on the three refs on that panel? I'm going with Howard Webb, Mark Clattenburg and Alex Ferguson.
The game is becoming way too corrupt and that is sad.Romelu Lukaku has escaped a ban for an alleged kick on Brighton's Gaetan Bong, which is a player and not a nightclub, apparently:
You must log in or register to see mediaAlleged?
They'll use it to punish the Niasses of this world, not the Lukakus.
Any guess on the three refs on that panel? I'm going with Howard Webb, Mark Clattenburg and Alex Ferguson.
I wish I didn't follow the game but I am addicted.
Money and so called officials dictate.
Do they publish an explanation? The only grounds would be if the ref saw it, and then it is a foul, no goal and a sending off?Romelu Lukaku has escaped a ban for an alleged kick on Brighton's Gaetan Bong, which is a player and not a nightclub, apparently:
You must log in or register to see mediaAlleged?
They'll use it to punish the Niasses of this world, not the Lukakus.
Any guess on the three refs on that panel? I'm going with Howard Webb, Mark Clattenburg and Alex Ferguson.
They don't explain the decision or say who's on the three-man panel. They all have to agree it's a red and they didn't.
It's utterly opaque so that they can pretend that they've done their job, when they clearly haven't.
It is bare faced, you have to give them credit, they just don't care about even appearing honest.
The funny thing is, that doesn't even matter. Even if he missed, it would still be a red.Never touched him
I know you're not serious, but it really does show how silly that decision is.
According to Dermot Gallagher, it was petulance rather than violent conduct and would have been a booking rather than a sending off.
I'm not sure many current refs would agree with his view. They would get a lot of flak if they did.
At least we know who was on the panel and is on the take, now.
petulance + physical contact - Man Utd shirt = Free pass