... It's the West Ham dilemma without the political back-handers.
It's like replacing ramos for Christian grossYesterday:
You must log in or register to see media24 hours later...
You must log in or register to see media

"Which England manager looked most like an owl?"
You must log in or register to see images
Seems to be a nice enough bloke and he had a very respectable career, but I think his day is done and he should retire, honestly.
Allardyce's decision to leave the game has resulted in someone eight years older than him getting the job.
Should be deemed a frivolous appeal and stuck with an extra game. It's just a blatant red.Liverpool are appealing Mane's three-match ban.
Errrr...on what grounds will this appeal get accepted?
Actually, this is the F.A. we are talking about here...Given their ridiculous decision making in the past, this could genuinely go either way.

Should be deemed a frivolous appeal and stuck with an extra game. It's just a blatant red.
If he'd made that tackle on a defender's knee then nobody would even have questioned it.
Kick a keeper in the face and people are talking about it being a big chance and him having to go for it.![]()
It did seriously harm an opponent. The guy had a couple of holes in his face.The rules are clear. Intent (which is subjective anyway) doesn't come into the equation. It was high, reckless and could have seriously harmed an opponent. Red card.
If the 3 game ban gets overturned, farcical would be an understatement.
Genuinely, I would love to know what supporting evidence they have to justify their decision to appeal.
Liverpool are appealing Mane's three-match ban.
Errrr...on what grounds will this appeal get accepted?
Judging by the apologists online and on punditry sofas, it will be because he...Liverpool are appealing Mane's three-match ban.
Errrr...on what grounds will this appeal get accepted?
Actually, this is the F.A. we are talking about here...Given their ridiculous decision making in the past, this could genuinely go either way.
It did seriously harm an opponent. The guy had a couple of holes in his face.
You must log in or register to see images
I actually agree with a. He didn't mean it and he wasn't being malicious. Doesn't mean it wasn't red, though.Judging by the apologists online and on punditry sofas, it will be because he...
a.) Didn't mean it
b.) Isn't that sort of player
c.) Ederson was asking for it
He's now got "character" to go with it!Surprisingly, it hasn't damaged his rakish good-looks.

It did seriously harm an opponent. The guy had a couple of holes in his face.
You must log in or register to see images
Never saw this! Judging by the apologists online and on punditry sofas, it will be because he...
a.) Didn't mean it
b.) Isn't that sort of player
c.) Ederson was asking for it