Footballer saying something stupid, shocker. His clarification on Twitter was quite funny though.
If you say soI finally managed to watch motd and watching the Arsenal game. Few points.
West Brom outplayed and out fought them.
How can you have a chance to make it 3-0 when you're only 1-0 up? What about our chance to win 2-1 at the end? Doesn't count because it's Arsenal and you don't like them eh?At 1 nil. West Brom had clear chances to make it 2 or 3 nil.
By back 4 I think you mean 'Mertesacker'.The arsenal back four was all over the place.
Alan Shearer-esque analysis thereArsenal scored from a deflected goal.
Don't remember that one (genuinely)... when was that?West Brom should have had a blatant pen.
Yup, that and the fact you got spanked 3-0 by a rubbish team who's only other prem win was the 1st game of the season, whereas we drew away at a team who'd just outplayed United at OT.So the only difference between our game and the goons was West Brom never took their chances.
More possession, more shots, more shots on goal. But yes, 2nd best.Arsenal got a lucky goal but where second best for most of the game.
I'm disappointed in lowering myself to respond to cack like this but I'm bored and have an hour off so here goes:
I.
Which basically means you're on the dole and desperate for attention. Unfortunately for you everyone on here views you as being dim and rather slow. But I'm sure your attempt at trying to debate made you feel 'clever'.
Which basically means you're on the dole and desperate for attention. Unfortunately for you everyone on here views you as being dim and rather slow. But I'm sure your attempt at trying to debate made you feel 'clever'.

He didn't debate, he tried to poke fun (badly). Not sure how "if you say so" is furthering the debate.
That to him is debating. It may not be what normal folk view as a debate, but to him that's trying to debate!

The hallmarks of WUMs:
1. Derogatory comments about intelligence
2. Thinking you have the opinion of every single poster on a forum
![]()
Footballer saying something stupid, shocker. His clarification on Twitter was quite funny though.

Is this where I get wound up. or start using smileys.
Nevernind. I'm sure you're feeble attempts at being a Wum work elsewhere.
You accuse someone of being stupid... and then claim YOU'RE being WUMmed? Are you for real?
Posting on a football forum? Today, yes.You posted you have an hour off. I take it this is how you spend your hour off?
A feeble attempt at what? It wasn't a definition of a WUM, it was my opinion of the common traits of what I think WUMs do.Posting the definition of a Wum. Was a feeble attempt.
I don't know what "in response to you are general posts" means... you're using 'your' and 'you're' incorrectly in a sentence while trying to accuse me of being dim. Good job.Me saying you're dim and slow was in response to you're general posts.
It's not going anywhere... it's just amusing.So decide where you want this discussion to lead as remember you only have an hour free.
It's been well over an hour. Get back to work, Cini!
