Why shouldn't teams ground share? It would make a lot of sense in so many ways. But we are too insular and parochial to consider it here. The thought of two rivals having the same ground is abhorrent to many. We all buy into history and tradition more than we are prepared to let on.
They all use to slate Eboue and Nasri, now some of them want them back
![]()
Name 1 person that LEGITIMATELY wants Eboue back.
Name 1 person that LEGITIMATELY wants Eboue back.
It's not so much an issue with Liverpool and Everton because that rivalry was never born out of hatred and bitterness like say... Arsenal and Spurs.
There are just certain rivalries where a ground share could never happen.
Name 1 person that LEGITIMATELY wants Eboue back.
I don't think that you've got a great handle on either rivalry, judging by that. They're pretty similar, even down to their origins.
I believe all four teams have shared a ground in the past.............
p.s. Neil Warnock hopes to see Mark Hughes destroy another "team of his!" Ouch!!!!!!!
It's not so much an issue with Liverpool and Everton because that rivalry was never born out of hatred and bitterness like say... Arsenal and Spurs.
There are just certain rivalries where a ground share could never happen.
Highly doubtful but does anyone know if its a benefit, points wise, to share a ground? After all, you get an extra "home" game each season assuming both teams are in the same div of course.
Or, are you more likely to say get 2 points from the 2 derbies instead of say 3?
It has always been a mystery to me why home advantage is so important, but if it is anything it has to be the crowd influence so I don't think home the derby away match will benefit from this
Name 1 person that LEGITIMATELY wants Eboue back.