I'm not banned, yet, but I have been threatened for almost no reason.
If you push it, you will get banned, and the excuse they will give for your banning is that (a) you had received previous warning for speaking the truth and trying to engage thick Chavs in honest, thought-provoking debate, and ignored them, (b) the decision was taken to ban you because your refusal to dumb-down your powers of argument and debate were upsetting Chav imbeciles, who do not yet have the courage to admit that their manager is clueless, their owner a mad meglo-maniac who is slowly but surely undoing any good he did for the club, their aging core of players no longer have the ability to compete at the top level, the likes of Lampo and Terry run the dressing room and it would ultimately be in the best interests of the club for the mad Russian to get shot of them (as SAF did to Ince, in the early days at United), and their captain is an utter disgrace to football.
Let's face it, these are the only real topics that any neutral would want to debate with the Chavs, but if you try to engage them on any of them, you will, eventually, be banned as a wum.
The only way to stop these idiot mods acting like despots and Nazis is to make it a cardinal rule on this forum that the only reason for banning, whether it be from a board or from the entire forum, is for openly abusing another poster. The idea that one can be banned simply because someone else does not like ones argument is, quite frankly, about as pathetically juvenile as it gets.