Rival Watch Thread Watch

  • Thread starter Thread starter Super G Ted'inho
  • Start date Start date
  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

What will Liverpool win in the 2014-15 season...?

  • Premier League

  • Champions League

  • FA Cup

  • League Cup

  • As much as Everton and Spurs!


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
You must log in or register to see media

You must log in or register to see media

You must log in or register to see media

You must log in or register to see media

[HASHTAG]#BacktoWengerin[/HASHTAG]
 
This is one of the stupidest statements I have ever heard in my long time following football. It actually took me a minute or two to process. Maybe I am interpreting what you said incorrectly but it seems that what you are saying is that no matter what a team has spent they can only send out 11 men and so can the opposition. It seems you are suggesting that if one team costs that 300 Million goes up against a team of lower league free transfers there is no advantage as each man on the field is a mere mortal of muscle sinew and bone, although clearly the 300 million buys a better quality squad. According to your moronic theory Man City and Chelsea have emerged from mid table to consistent premier league challengers out of nowhere and miraculously got the hang of the whole 11 v 11 thing, not the billion odd pounds each has spent. The most successful team in history Real Madrid who spend massive amounts of money every year are also not at an advantage in your opinion when it comes down to matchday because they can only field 11 men v anther 11 men. I may have understood you wrong but I am not going to bother responding to the rest of your post as an idiot who genuinely believes the above simply does not understand even the most basic football concepts and cannot be taken seriously.

Pretty sure 5 years of age and a cry baby is not a long time following football
 
The top four run-in after this weekend's games:

3. Arsenal: QPR (A), West Ham (H), Newcastle (A), Liverpool (H), Burnley (A), Sunderland (H), Chelsea (H), Hull (A), Swansea (H), Man Utd (A), West Brom (H)

4. Man Utd: Newcastle (A), Tottenham (H), Liverpool (A), Aston Villa (H), Man City (H), Chelsea (A), Everton (A), West Brom (H), Crystal Palace (A), Arsenal (H), Hull (A)

5. LFC: Burnley (H), Swansea (A), Man Utd (H), Arsenal (A), Newcastle (H), Hull (A), West Brom (A), QPR (H), Chelsea (A), Crystal Palace (H), Stoke (A)

6. Southampton: Crystal Palace (H), Chelsea (A), Burnley (H), Everton (A), Hull (H), Stoke (A), Tottenham (H), Sunderland (A), Leicester (A), Aston Villa (H), Man City (A)

7. Spurs: Swansea (H), QPR (A), Man Utd (A), Leicester (H), Burnley (A), Aston Villa (H), Newcastle (A), Southampton (A), Man City (H), Stoke (A), Hull (H), Everton (A)
 
How the **** did that Herrera goal make the goal of the month competition?

Just because it was the only Man Utd goal that wasn't a pen or longball?

[HASHTAG]#bbcsalford[/HASHTAG]
 
  • Like
Reactions: Enricky.
How the **** did that Herrera goal make the goal of the month competition?

Just because it was the only Man Utd goal that wasn't a pen or longball?

[HASHTAG]#bbcsalford[/HASHTAG]

It was a good goal, we only have had 2 pens all season and we dont play THAT much longball
 
It was well taken, but hardly Goal of the Month material. It looked pretty ordinary in the company it was keeping.

^^ This. Decent finish but nothing 'special' about it, which is what GOTM is all about. Reeks of beeb desperation to get one Utd effort in the list to prove they're not a total irrelevance bar their erroneous and misrepresentative league position
 
Or it could just be that all other goals in that month weren't as good <whistle>
 
First time I seen the United pen Brown/O'Shea red card.

The fact the ref didn't think O'Shea commited a foul and actually thought the challenge from Brown was the foul means he shouldn't have actually given a penalty at all.

United getting lucky with the refs again :bandit:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.