Rival Watch Thread Watch

He'd thrive at City where he could pretty much get any player he wanted and impose his principles on a blank slate

 

True, no league or CL title and the picture could change, but I'm not sure if the profile of the manager and profile of the club are a match

 

Real wouldn't suit Klopp, he'll want to go somewhere he can build something, and that aint Madrid.

 

Feel free to name all those City managers who went on to become greats of the game.

Or shut up. Yeh, the second option.

 

Good point. Real want it all and they want it now

 

Mancini is at the level he was before. Only Italian football is not what it was.
Hughes Pearce ect are at the level they were before City, so no change there.

In other words, you are talking bollocks because you are trying to relate Manchester City the club, to the careers of managers before they singed and afterwards.

City has no bearing on what they did before and what they do afterwards, but you think the club does have a bearing on those things because you are a clown who doesn't think before he starts tapping keys.


Stupid paddies eh
During the early decades of the seventh century many Anglo-Saxon nobles were educated at Irish monasteries in northern Britain

 

Aint city either though. If he can go to City, he can go to madrid.

City are going to have to spend 100s of millions to compete. Thats not Klopps style. They will Demand immediate success and ready made stars. Again, this isn't Klopps mo.

If he holds on a year, or takes a temporary job then his options are far better. The likes of Bayern, Barcelona and Arsenal may well be available. Far better suited tl Klopp than City or Madrid.

 

Where did he say anything about them being 'greats'?? All we're discussing is a career choice for one manager

 

Thanks for that. Not one of them went on to better things. All went backwards from City.

Good to know you agree, even if you are to stupid to realise it.

 

So, if I get a job and then leave it and my career goes to ****, it's the jobs fauly and not mine? That's your logic.

Sometimes I depair at your stupidity mate. You just keep digging and digging yourself deeper by your refusal to accept you are wrong, keep going, you'll find Kangaroos soon.

There's more than a little irony in you calling me stupid given the contents of the morning's posts on this thread

 

When he replied to my point about City being a managerial wasteland.

A bit like Madrid, except there is some pride in managing Madrid.

 

If being a football manager where your entire career is broadcast to the world compares with whatever it is you do then yes.

As it doesnt compare at all. Then no.

 

Complete bollocks. Every man is responsible for his own decisions.

Your logic is so ****ed up it's unreal, and your self delusion is even worse. The things you make yourself believe in order to continue along your path of ****e speak is

Somehow, managers who did a **** job at City due to their own failings, is the fault of the club's? I wouldn't mind like, you of all people slated Mancini so many times when he was at City and now when it suits your blow in the wind opinion, it's not his fault, it's City's?



You truly are the NOT06 village idiot.

Why do you keep coming back for more?

 

please log in to view this image

 

Agree and disagree with you here.

'If he can go to City, he can go to madrid.' - City have nowhere near the profile or illustrious history of Madrid but have the same desire for current success, this makes them very different clubs, new money versus old money if you will. Madrid can't afford to allow their brand to be tarnished by lack of success. City are trying to build their brand and will need to rebuild their team. For those reasons Klopp is a likelier option for City in my mind.

'City are going to have to spend 100s of millions to compete. Thats not Klopps style.' - If he goes there I'd imagine there will be some high profile signings since the club likes these, but they will also want him to do some of his own work on their current players and in the transfer market to fall in line with FFP as they can't just keep throwing money at the thing, plus after their crushingly average performance this season I'm not sure how convinced the owners will be to keep funding such an elaborate failure.

'If he holds on a year, or takes a temporary job then his options are far better.' - He's said that he has no plans for a sabbatical so seems to be in the market now, could see Arsenal being interested but Wenger has just had his best season with them in years and has the new contract so that probably rules them out (this time last year it would have been a dead cert), Bayern and Barca are both settled. I don't think he'd go to Bayern anyway.

 

What on earth are you babbling about.

The irony of calling me an idiot though you might be a moron but you are funny.

 

Sorry mate, but I had to, I do feel bad but, it had to be done

please log in to view this image

 

Pat yourself on the back. This is like yesterday when despite huge evidence to the contrary, Sisu knows best.

Typical theotist behaviour. Come, join us in reality sometime.

 

Yep same ****e when you get mullered. "Reality" "Conspiracy" and false claims you proved anything.

Even when you resorted to national stereotypes you still got ****ing owned.

Will you ever learn? No probably not.

You just embarrass yourself. When you get owned on a subject, you switch to insults and changing the subject, get into politics it would suit you