Thank you. More input than your thread I think.
Not very much more!
Thank you. More input than your thread I think.

The original post was clearly not a wind up and didn't deserve the response it received.
What is it with some of the people who have replied to this article?
"If you think Lambert's only contribution is goals then you clearly either don't go to games or are mentally disturbed."
Calling it pointless is not "abusive". Get a grip.
No it's not, but had you taken the trouble to read it all you would have seen the other part of the same comment asked "are you a complete idiot?" That might not be abusive to you but I think it is.
Cheers IOAG - to be honest, you aren't going to get through to some people. If we were having this debate face to face they wouldn't be half as offensive. Some users think I'm over reacting which is fine. I was only voicing my concerns over something that could happen. Apparently to some people that means I need to have my intelligence insulted fine. If you don't agree with something and can't be bothered to make a decent argument then don't comment at all. It isn't good for generating debate.

I don't see how this is a pointless thread. I know how well he played against Leeds, maybe I didn't communicate my point very well. My only concern is that if he doesn't score soon he may develop a mental block about scoring at this level. I am not on his back, I rate him highly, if you read my opening statement I said he should be our main striker! It seems slot of you don't read properly or jump to conclusions and don't bother reading the rest of the thread, I had even stated in my second reply that it was more concern than anything...
FFS. I don't think it was a stupid thing to write and I won't apologise for it. But some of your responses are a bit needlessly aggressive when a simple "I can see what you are saying but RL will be fine".
You must log in or register to see images
godzilla was fail, he cant judge anyone.