So them doing it makes it right that we do it?
Not saying he should or shouldn't have walked, just that using the excuse of 'they do it' is pretty poor IMO
PS...who was it the other day that said we needed a 300 lead?![]()
Dunno. Some ill-informed ****

So them doing it makes it right that we do it?
Not saying he should or shouldn't have walked, just that using the excuse of 'they do it' is pretty poor IMO
PS...who was it the other day that said we needed a 300 lead?![]()

Dunno. Some ill-informed ****![]()

He obviously knows nothing about cricket![]()

This is very true
So come on then. You can't tell me you didn't enjoy that.

I didn't watch it but I did keep track of the scores (as I do every Ashes series) before watching the highlights![]()

That doesn't answer the question. does it?![]()

Tms is the best cricket commentary by far. It's quintessentially English listening to blofeld talk about cake and wine with a bit of cricket thrown in.
It'll be London buses from ThursdayGerrez:5015319 said:

We did win with a lead of 298.
Say No to Test cricket.
ODI and 20/20 all the way! Woo hoooooo

No, we won with a lead of 311. If the Aussies had been chasing 298, they would have been a lot more sensible on the last couple of runs knowing they were so close to victory (not that 14 is a millions miles away mind). Plus, the English players would have been that bit more nervous too!

Don't be bloody ridiculous, James. The first test was ****ing awesome. Drama running right the way through from the first day to the last![]()