I've never seen one bowl, firing ping pong balls yes. Spin bowling, no.
You been to Thailand as well?
Jordan's not a spin bowler, by the way
RHC's Cricket Thread
- Thread starter Red Hadron Collider
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
You been to Thailand as well?
Jordan's not a spin bowler, by the way
for those who've no clue what the lads are on about
APPEAL - NOT OUT - Ind 105-3
Oh dear! That's another umpiring mistake, and this time it's India who benefit as Moeen Ali gets one to grip and turn and the ball tickles the glove of Ajinkya Rahane on its way down the leg side to the wicketkeeper. Not out, says Rod Tucker. Replays show it was. There is no DRS in this series, remember.
lifted right off bbc feed.
england had how many go their way yesterday?
APPEAL - NOT OUT - Ind 105-3
Oh dear! That's another umpiring mistake, and this time it's India who benefit as Moeen Ali gets one to grip and turn and the ball tickles the glove of Ajinkya Rahane on its way down the leg side to the wicketkeeper. Not out, says Rod Tucker. Replays show it was. There is no DRS in this series, remember.
lifted right off bbc feed.
england had how many go their way yesterday?
You been to Thailand as well?
Jordan's not a spin bowler, by the way
No mate, Widnes
No mate, Widnes
That really is a ****ing ****hole of the highest order. She must have been a lovely girl
Well ping pong ball is ok but if it had been a cricket ball would the seam have been wobbling... critical question here.
That would be excellent. We'll be doing well to get more than one more before 200 though, I feel. And the tail can wag, especially against England. Still, going ok so far.
156/4 is very very good on this wicket so if you see it that 53 overs of this ball are gone there's another 26/7 of the ball then the new ball will be into them.
I think 300 would be an amazing take but I can see england batting again tomorrow seeing around 400 then declaring with bowlers having their feet up.... in an ideal perfect world.
I think 300 would be an amazing take but I can see england batting again tomorrow seeing around 400 then declaring with bowlers having their feet up.... in an ideal perfect world.
bow4fowler ☆;6819995 said:
I would also like another 2 wickets before 300. Anderson is bowling beautifully and Jordan has settled down a bit.
200 or 300 (previous posts referred to 200)? 200's starting to look unlikely given that they're on 174. 2 more before is presumably a minimum requirement if we want to win.
210/5. i thin kthats good....
rememebr they are way behind so now the follow on starts nagging and a bit of panic might set in, or total negativity which dries up runs which add more pressure.
rememebr they are way behind so now the follow on starts nagging and a bit of panic might set in, or total negativity which dries up runs which add more pressure.
Typo
I noticed the T30 typo in the pub as well
How many do we want out by 300? 7, so two more?
I noticed the T30 typo in the pub as well
How many do we want out by 300? 7, so two more?
The ****ing lot. I don't think I did the T30 one.