RHC's Cricket Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
What's the team news? Bell at 3, Balance at 6? Bresnan in for Tremlett?
 
Alastair Cook (C)
Michael Carberry
Joe Root
Kevin Pietersen
Ian Bell
Ben Stokes
Matt Prior (W)
Stuart Broad
Graeme Swann
James Anderson
Monty Panesar


Stokes?! **** me... Guy isn't good enough batsman of bowler to be in the team. Panesar is a risk but if they think the pitch is going to spin then fair enough.
 
Alastair Cook (C)
Michael Carberry
Joe Root
Kevin Pietersen
Ian Bell
Ben Stokes
Matt Prior (W)
Stuart Broad
Graeme Swann
James Anderson
Monty Panesar


Stokes?! **** me... Guy isn't good enough batsman of bowler to be in the team. Panesar is a risk but if they think the pitch is going to spin then fair enough.


I just think they've lost the plot on this tour for some bizarre reason. Anyway fingers crossed I actually get to see some play before I fall asleep <laugh> Bloody aussie weather eh <doh>
 
It's like being back in England <laugh>

Can't believe they went off for 5 minutes because of a bit of drizzle. Took them longer to get the covers on than it was raining for.
 
It's like being back in England

Can't believe they went off for 5 minutes because of a bit of drizzle. Took them longer to get the covers on than it was raining for.

Doesn't help itself sometimes cricket does it <doh>

Could do with getting Warner out early see if we can rattle their top order but he looks a solid player unfortunately.
 
Bals lost it's shape after 5 overs <doh>

Warner has gone into one day mode here... 23 from 19 already.
 
That Carberry drop of Haddin at the end was nothing short of disgusting. I would really feel the need to drop him for it, utterly ridiculous. He owes his bowlers a big century now.

We've no chance if they keep spilling catches.
 
So. 273 - 5. That Haddin drop could prove horrifically expensive.As Rufflad said, Carberry owes us a big century. Could have been worse. but it could have been a hell of a lot better.
 
That Carberry drop of Haddin at the end was nothing short of disgusting. I would really feel the need to drop him for it, utterly ridiculous. He owes his bowlers a big century now.

We've no chance if they keep spilling catches.

We dropped 3 ffs <doh> so frustrating.... but....we have kept ourselves in with a shout at least. If we can limit them to 400 and score something similar then the two spinners might just make the difference.
 
We dropped 3 ffs <doh> so frustrating.... but....we have kept ourselves in with a shout at least. If we can limit them to 400 and score something similar then the two spinners might just make the difference.

Saw those drops, 1st one being Monty off his own bowling, was hit quite hard back at him, I'm thankful he stopped a boundary.
Root's chance would have been a worldie had he taken it, so not gonna have a go at him for not holding on.
Carberry... well, that's just <doh> with a bit FFS thrown in for good measure!
 
Carberry's normally a ****ing good fielder as well. Need really quick wickets on day 2.

I'd have been confident of knocking them over tomorrow morning had we taken Hadin at the end, but he can stick around and score quickly and Clarke is on fire..
Keeping them under 400 won't matter a jot if we bat like a bunch fannies in our first innings!