Republic.
- Thread starter Cyclonic
- Start date
I am outside...
Anyway, now I have done the research, put forward my point and expressed my opinion, I think that yes, I shall enjoy the sunshine some more before the storms come back
Thanks for you're succinct and half-arsed evaluation
My pleasure. Thank you for your well thought out and carefully enunciated gibberish.
1. Really? Have you been living under a rock? I think I have succumbed somewhat to artistic licence, based on subjective appreciation of the phrase, but if you care to do your own research, you'll see a number of countries have left the commonwealth.
2. Thanks for that subjective fightback which typifies the bullshit arguments monarchists rely on... You curiously fight nothing else and it's been noted.
I have lived in various places in Scotland and Wales, and from my experience I've not met one person who agrees with the monarchy of "Britain". If you have lived in Scotland(/Edinburgh) or Wales and have a different experience, fair enough, but it hardly dents any of my arguments because it was just something I have noticed, and I'd never call it a "FACT". There's not been a referendum on the subject.
If you care to invest your own time and research the independence issue in Scotland, however, you'll see some strong views on the monarchy which might persuade you of my opinion
Wales and Scotland have always valued their individual identity, and often it's commented upon that they have to suffer the "British National Anthem" when their sportstars win at the Olympics.
Hahaha gibberish, hopefully you are a monarchist, otherwise you're wasting your talents. You are a very pleasant poster though.
Sorry got mixed up with you, your on the benefit scroungers side, I only post the truth.
You asked them all did you? Never seen a Rangers or Hearts fan with a Union Jack singing GSTQ, Rule Britannia?
Bullshitter.
I like the Norwegian Royal Family they actually have real jobs like accountants, Lawyers and even a Estate Agent.
I would like ours more if they where just a bit more like this!
I would like ours more if they where just a bit more like this!
1. Really? Have you been living under a rock? I think I have succumbed somewhat to artistic licence, based on subjective appreciation of the phrase, but if you care to do your own research, you'll see a number of countries have left the commonwealth.
2. Thanks for that subjective fightback which typifies the bullshit arguments monarchists rely on... You curiously fight nothing else and it's been noted.
I have lived in various places in Scotland and Wales, and from my experience I've not met one person who agrees with the monarchy of "Britain". If you have lived in Scotland(/Edinburgh) or Wales and have a different experience, fair enough, but it hardly dents any of my arguments because it was just something I have noticed, and I'd never call it a "FACT". There's not been a referendum on the subject.
If you care to invest your own time and research the independence issue in Scotland, however, you'll see some strong views on the monarchy which might persuade you of my opinion
Wales and Scotland have always valued their individual identity, and often it's commented upon that they have to suffer the "British National Anthem" when their sportstars win at the Olympics.
I didn't fight anything else because I only read the top and bottom of your essay! The Queen isn't as popular in Scotland and in Wales as she is in England, which is understandable, but to say that she is hated is nonsense! I am still intrigued to know who has been leaving the Commonwealth, "left, right and bloody centre", I can only think of Zimbabwe, but I am sure you will know better. For ****s sake Mozambique joined the Commonwealth not so long ago and they are Portuguese you daft ****!
I didn't have to ask most times! You must therefore never have been to Scotland, or else are deluded.
By no means would I say EVERYONE in Scotland hates them, but I'd say given my personal experience and the evidence from national debates and political
impetus, it's not unfair to say that Scotland would not be in favour if ever a referendum took place. Basically you're picking the only subjective element of my proposal and throwing your subjective bias back at it, even though it has no relevance to my overall conclusions or arguments, to make your idiotic agenda make sense. That's why I say "check the facts yourself" on here, because either the poster is moronic and will just take that as "winning" and leave it alone, or else will actually take the time to check. As of yet, nobody fits into the last group
Based on what?
Like I say you can read all about the Commonwealth and the views about it, and come to your own conclusions, without me having to spoon feed you like the ignorant baby you are!
Here's another loser. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...called-boorish-bungling-freeloader-envoy.html
That is the thing, you aren't spoon feeding me anything, you are speaking ****e. You said that countries were leaving the Commonwealth all the time and I named one and named one non-ex-British country that has joined, so I think there is only one conclusion that can be arrived at and it is you haven't a clue what you are spouting on about. Clown.
I may as well talk to a three year old, based on your comprehension skills...
As I said, it's unnecessary for me to find the information for you, because you are perfectly capable of googling
You clearly aren't capable of reading an "essay", so why should I waste my time on someone who is too idiotic and lackadaisical to read something that doesn't represent their own view?
What you should be thinking about is whether you are simply retaliating like a little child because I've challenged your views. If you proved yourself right after research, how would you then construct an argument that would flatten all of my points when you don't even know what my points are? It's just pathetic
But the thing I understand about Mozambique and why it joined the commonwelath, was to give british and american troops a country in Africa to base there fight against northern Islamic countries of Africa on the east coast.
They get aid for a war ravaged country and Britain and its allies get a base.
They get aid for a war ravaged country and Britain and its allies get a base.
I didn't have to ask most times! You must therefore never have been to Scotland, or else are deluded.
By no means would I say EVERYONE in Scotland hates them, but I'd say given my personal experience and the evidence from national debates and political
impetus, it's not unfair to say that Scotland would not be in favour if ever a referendum took place. Basically you're picking the only subjective element of my proposal and throwing your subjective bias back at it, even though it has no relevance to my overall conclusions or arguments, to make your idiotic agenda make sense. That's why I say "check the facts yourself" on here, because either the poster is moronic and will just take that as "winning" and leave it alone, or else will actually take the time to check. As of yet, nobody fits into the last group
I couldn't be bothered to respond to the points on your initial essay as many were quite extraordinarily stupid for example:
Who has claimed that we need the royals to head the military? Anyone? Ever?
I may as well talk to a three year old, based on your comprehension skills...
As I said, it's unnecessary for me to find the information for you, because you are perfectly capable of googling
You clearly aren't capable of reading an "essay", so why should I waste my time on someone who is too idiotic and lackadaisical to read something that doesn't represent their own view?
What you should be thinking about is whether you are simply retaliating like a little child because I've challenged your views. If you proved yourself right after research, how would you then construct an argument that would flatten all of my points when you don't even know what my points are? It's just pathetic
What the **** are you on about, are you drunk? I will explain it again, you said that countries were leaving the Commonwealth, "left, right and bloody centre", I simply stated that only one has left, therefore you were wrong/speaking ****, it isn't about me having a differing view/opinion from you, it is about me being right and you being wrong. End of story.