We have won 8 in a row. Use some brains before you post
We dont give a flying ****, use your **** off button ya clown.
QPR v Burnley ( MD Thread )
- Thread starter QPR999
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
We dont give a flying ****, use your **** off button ya clown.
Supreme intellect.................
If you were that clever you would'nt live in a shyte hole like leicester.
Sharp wit............................
Should'nt that read as FUKWIT
Dashing looks......................
I've been to leicester dumbass and there aint a good looking fella in the entire county of leicestershire, and the women are even uglier.
So you're wrong on all 3 counts,
And i make that 3 strikes and your out
SO **** OFF AND DO ONE !!!!!!!!!!!!!
Turkish" Premier" Hoops;6022788 said:
Think you will find this is exactly what they want. Still plenty of games t go yet so I won't be taking any note of their gloating at this stage.
And the Turks are extremely Hairy ugly & smelly particularly the women 
10 pts clear mind the gap
10 pts clear mind the gap
If it does then Mitsubishi will be a bit embarrassed as they have a Pajero 4-wheel drive...
Very exciting game!!
Our defending was very poor at times, with Ned looking rusty and Dunne losing Ings for the first and Vogts for the second, although Hoilett should have worked much harder to prevent the cross for that 2nd one.
Great debut from Doyle and at least we didn't lose.
A good, old fashioned 4-4-2 v 4-4-2. Although, our 4-4-2 had no holding midfielder and that meant that the two CBs were badly exposed. Probably the most attacking line up from Harry so far.........could have gone either way!
Our defending was very poor at times, with Ned looking rusty and Dunne losing Ings for the first and Vogts for the second, although Hoilett should have worked much harder to prevent the cross for that 2nd one.
Great debut from Doyle and at least we didn't lose.
A good, old fashioned 4-4-2 v 4-4-2. Although, our 4-4-2 had no holding midfielder and that meant that the two CBs were badly exposed. Probably the most attacking line up from Harry so far.........could have gone either way!
The same game in hand you had last week but we have increased the gap by a further 2 points since
All he's saying we still have an opportunity to claw back a few points. Nobody here is doubting Leicesters quality or their right to be at the top of the pile. We know you're good, why you persist on coming on here saying 'oooh, look how good we are' I really don't know. Its just all a bit pathetic.
Yep.......congratulations on winning the league. Hopefully we can get 2nd. Now, as you have it all sewn up there really is no reason for you or that other muppet to come on here any more. Bye!
Well one of them won't be coming on here for the rest of the season, and if the other one carries on he can go missing too.
And here we go again. Onuoha was "rusty" but Dunne was at fault for two goals
The second goal was NOT Dunne's fault although he wasn't entirely blameless. It was Onuoha's and Hoilett's. Was there any QPR footballing person that wasn't screaming at the space their left winger was given at that particular time -IE not using the benefit of hindsight? I'd say anyone with half an iota about the game was and then when he had decided to pick his man, the result was near inevitable. Dunne could have done better alright but only a halfwit would pick him out as the reason that goal went in.
Time to go to Specsavers Colin
Could not believe onuoha gave him so much space, everyone in x block was screaming for him to get closer but him and hoillett just stood looking at each other
