QPR 0 Chelsea 0

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Grifter said:
You must have been watching a completely different match flyer, have a browse of all the QPR forums and notice the lack of SWP criticism this week. Phenomenal, i was genuinely going to start a thread talking about how decent SWP. Defensively he was everywhere, and played far beyond his stature. There was some great link up play in the middle of the park too.
I'm sorry but this: "SWP was awful yet again", just smacks of someone who made up their mind on SWP a long time ago, without paying attention to how he's playing at the moment
Click to expand...

Agreed. SWP was good today. I also thought Hazard looked very classy....not sure what Flyer was watching?
 
Flyer said:
He was totally invisible and never in the game. Fair enough that you expect that from Ephraim who isnt very good but this guy cost tens of millions.

Where was mata? I was looking forward to him ****ting it as well.
Click to expand...

Your sentence didn't make any sense mate.
 
District Line said:
Personally I thought Faurlin was the best player on the pitch.

I Don't mean any disrespect to QPR when u say this but I've rated him for a while and I reckon he wouldn't look at of place at a Man Utd or Bayern Munich.

Very good player
Click to expand...
Agree with you District
I bet you would like him instead of Lumpard
 
Flyer said:
He was totally invisible and never in the game. Fair enough that you expect that from Ephraim who isnt very good but this guy cost tens of millions.

Where was mata? I was looking forward to him ****ting it as well.
Click to expand...

He only returned yesterday. He was given time off as he hasn't had a break from football in over 2 years. It was agreed in principle with Spain
 
gimmethickerhoops said:
Agree with you District
I bet you would like him instead of Lumpard
Click to expand...

He's much more apt in the role than Lampard and barely ever loses possession. He looked a class above Lampard today, you wouldn't have know who was the £100,000+ a week player if you closed your eyes. Hope he stays fit, not nice to see good players get long lay offs
 
District Line said:
Personally I thought Faurlin was the best player on the pitch.

I Don't mean any disrespect to QPR when u say this but I've rated him for a while and I reckon he wouldn't look at of place at a Man Utd or Bayern Munich.

Very good player
Click to expand...

I completely agree district, many of us have been saying this since his days in the championship. Even more impressive is how well he's playing given the massive injury lay off. He was blowing out of his arse by the 65th minute, but still managed to be one of our better players right up to the final whistle!
 
Flyer said:
How? He put in a rubbish performance like Ephraim does.
Click to expand...

It's no biggy mate....but........"He was the 2nd worst player on the pitch behind Hazard who pulled and Ephraim." makes no sense at all. BTW...Hazard looked classy mate.
 
Grifter said:
I completely agree district, many of us have been saying this since his days in the championship. Even more impressive is how well he's playing given the massive injury lay off. He was blowing out of his arse by the 65th minute, but still managed to be one of our better players right up to the final whistle!
Click to expand...

Faurlin was fantastic wasn't he? Surely everyone is converted now? Brix..........?
 
rangercol said:
It's no biggy mate....but........"He was the 2nd worst player on the pitch behind Hazard who pulled and Ephraim." makes no sense at all. BTW...Hazard looked classy mate.
Click to expand...

SWP was the 2nd worst player on the pitch behind Hazard who played like Ephraim. take out the d of the "and" and it makes sense.
 
Flyer said:
SWP was the 2nd worst player on the pitch behind Hazard who played like Ephraim. take out the d of the "and" and it makes sense.
Click to expand...

I thought worst players on the pitch were

1. Lampard (no contest)
2. SWP
3. Ramires

In Ramires' defence he was being played out of position. I didn't think Hazard was that bad but the probably is due to the early hype everybody expects him to pull a rabbit out the hat every game. He was the only player we had that made something look like happening until Moses came to the fore.

No Chelsea player impressed me much bar Mikel and maybe Bertrand
 
How mikel didn't get a yellow i'll never know.. He's a right dirty so and so! He practically hugged the referee during your first booking and almost knocked his card out of his hand, that's a yellow in itself.
 
Flyer said:
SWP was the 2nd worst player on the pitch behind Hazard who played like Ephraim. take out the d of the "and" and it makes sense.
Click to expand...

You didn't say "played like Ephraim".....you said "who pulled and Ephraim"!! Oh, I get it....who pulled an Ephraim.......as in played like Ephraim. English not your first language mate? :wink:
Oh and I still think Hazard looked class.
 
District Line said:
I thought worst players on the pitch were

1. Lampard (no contest)
2. SWP
3. Ramires

In Ramires' defence he was being played out of position. I didn't think Hazard was that bad but the probably is due to the early hype everybody expects him to pull a rabbit out the hat every game. He was the only player we had that made something look like happening until Moses came to the fore.

No Chelsea player impressed me much bar Mikel and maybe Bertrand
Click to expand...

I dont think SWP was our worst player
I would give that to Onuoha for the short time he was on
Mackie and Cisse struggled to get into the game when they came on and Zamora was pretty average throughout the game
 
District Line said:
I thought worst players on the pitch were

1. Lampard (no contest)
2. SWP
3. Ramires

In Ramires' defence he was being played out of position. I didn't think Hazard was that bad but the probably is due to the early hype everybody expects him to pull a rabbit out the hat every game. He was the only player we had that made something look like happening until Moses came to the fore.

No Chelsea player impressed me much bar Mikel and maybe Bertrand
Click to expand...

I quite like Lampard DL. I thought Granero and Faurlin really bossed you in the middle today which must have been a bit of a surprise eh? Also thought SWP played quite well....but I'd never start him ahead of Hoilett or Tarrabt...especially against the "lesser" teams (not you!!). Ramires looked well out of sorts I thought. Hazard looks class.
 
rangercol said:
You didn't say "played like Ephraim".....you said "who pulled and Ephraim"!! Oh, I get it....who pulled an Ephraim.......as in played like Ephraim. English not your first language mate? :wink:
Oh and I still think Hazard looked class.
Click to expand...
Have you never heard of the phrase "who pulled an.." I would say someone "pulled a Drogba" if they were rolling around on the ground only to get up with no problems or "pulled a Barton" if they hit the 1st man on every set piece.
 
Flyer said:
Have you never heard of the phrase "who pulled an.." I would say someone "pulled a Drogba" if they were rolling around on the ground only to get up with no problems or "pulled a Barton" if they hit the 1st man on every set piece.
Click to expand...
When you say about Barton hitting the first man, did you mean with the ball???????
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back