Off Topic Prince Andrew
- Thread starter Libby
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
I do mate.And his sympathisers
'She knew what she was doing' - This is their first line of defence when talking about a 14, 15, 16, 17 year old girl. It raises eyebrows straightaway because an adult that has no interest in a child apart from wanting to protect them would automatically think she's been groomed and even if she wanted to go around with all these celebs, then we know it's 100% on the adults to tell the young girl to sling her hook. It's always on the adult. Posters on here make excuses for the adult and attack the victim of abuse. That is a trait of somebody siding with child abuse.
People are siding with Andrew's memory. Again, an automatic defence of a child abuser and sympathy punted straight in their direction. The fact he can apparently remember what he done on a random day in April about 20 years ago when he took his children out but can't remember dancing, being photographed and shagging the young girl in question tells every respectful adult with common sense that he's lying and he's lying to cover his back because of what he done and knew what was going on. He even lied about sweating. Lies, lies and more lies. A trait of a child abuser will be to always target the victim and excuse the attacker.
'She's only in it for the money' - A normal respectful adults first thought is to think that lass deserves every penny she can get from them dirty bastards who abused her and took away her innocence. A trait of a child abuser will be to attack the victim and try to make them responsible while at the same time giving reasons for the attacker to be blameless.
Can you spot a pattern yet, Sucky? I'd swear on my kids lives that there's *****philes use the premier league board after the comments I've seen over the last year or so over these sort of incidents.
Big Ern has a lot to answer for
Seriously tho, like you said before anyone watching that interview who comes away thinking anything other than hes a lying sweaty **** needs to look again.
Its written all over him, his body language, the regular stuttering, i said to someone on this thread before, "hes like a child youve just caught red handed, covered in crayon & walls covered in crayon, and he still says... "i dunno" when you ask who done it
They do if they havent eaten a baby for more than 8 days
He jet sets around the world meeting power and influential people... Yet we expect a mundane family outing twenty years ago to be remembered to the day... Of course that's bull.
On the other hand I don't think he's necessarily lying when he said he doesn't remember that girl. Doesn't mean I think that means he is innocent... But why would he remember some escort he banged twenty years ago?
He's probably had plenty of high end hookers and hook ups over the years. Even if he's guilty, theres probably nothing specific about this girl that would make him remember her.
It's entirely feasible he's forgot about her. I'm pretty sure there are some girls I danced with and probably got photographed with twenty years ago when I was in Uni that I don't remember now. I think I'd remember everyone I had sex with, but I'm not in the upper double digits or triple digits like some rich royalty playboy would be.
And his sympathisers
'She knew what she was doing' - This is their first line of defence when talking about a 14, 15, 16, 17 year old girl. It raises eyebrows straightaway because an adult that has no interest in a child apart from wanting to protect them would automatically think she's been groomed and even if she wanted to go around with all these celebs, then we know it's 100% on the adults to tell the young girl to sling her hook. It's always on the adult. Posters on here make excuses for the adult and attack the victim of abuse. That is a trait of somebody siding with child abuse.
People are siding with Andrew's memory. Again, an automatic defence of a child abuser and sympathy punted straight in their direction. The fact he can apparently remember what he done on a random day in April about 20 years ago when he took his children out but can't remember dancing, being photographed and shagging the young girl in question tells every respectful adult with common sense that he's lying and he's lying to cover his back because of what he done and knew what was going on. He even lied about sweating. Lies, lies and more lies. A trait of a child abuser will be to always target the victim and excuse the attacker.
'She's only in it for the money' - A normal respectful adults first thought is to think that lass deserves every penny she can get from them dirty bastards who abused her and took away her innocence. A trait of a child abuser will be to attack the victim and try to make them responsible while at the same time giving reasons for the attacker to be blameless.
Can you spot a pattern yet, Sucky? I'd swear on my kids lives that there's *****philes use the premier league board after the comments I've seen over the last year or so over these sort of incidents.
I find it quite strange how the public look at grooming. I remember the case of Begum the terrorist, and I made it clear at the time that not only was she groomed, but other kids at the same school were also groomed.
No one wanted to see it though, because it didn't fit the political agendas of fighting terrorism. Cops and government were all swayed by public opinion - even Milk made the comment yesterday or the day before how 17 year olds emotions change (too young).
My point being what I find odd is grooming only applies to sex it seems.
If he did really forget her, and i agree its possible, given to him.. it was just another shag so to speak.
But i bet he remembers her now
even if he says he doesnt
Yeah, I mean, if the queen had a daughter named Andrea, and Andrea went out ****ing a different guy each night... And one night she screwed you.
You would remember the night you banged a Princess forever. She wouldn't remember you (unless you had something like a two headed penis, or Thomas the tank engine tattooed on your wang.)
Exactly, anyone of school age is open to some form of grooming. The problem with knife crime is we ain't doing anything about it, it's all well and good doing searches, and putting people away when found guilty of using a knife, but we need to discourage them being carried in the first place. You litterally need to be authoritarian about it. Maybe a few chinese style detention centres is the answer.
And the absolute joke sentences passed out to those who use/carry them.Exactly, anyone of school age is open to some form of grooming. The problem with knife crime is we ain't doing anything about it, it's all well and good doing searches, and putting people away when found guilty of using a knife, but we need to discourage them being carried in the first place. You litterally need to be authoritarian about it. Maybe a few chinese style detention centres is the answer.
Im with ya in that all for going full gestapo on that issue in particular, ive lost a mate to a knife and been cut myself when i was younger.
If there aint enough room in prisons cool, start bootcamps for these ****s and try fix them before its too late.
2 words mate. Peer pressure. The biggest head turner there is with kids.Exactly, anyone of school age is open to some form of grooming. The problem with knife crime is we ain't doing anything about it, it's all well and good doing searches, and putting people away when found guilty of using a knife, but we need to discourage them being carried in the first place. You litterally need to be authoritarian about it. Maybe a few chinese style detention centres is the answer.
Tell yer, do what they do in some other countries or have done in the past, if you get done for a crime your family spend time in a detention centre to. That would soon ensure future generations of kids were nurtured not to carry one.
And his sympathisers
'She knew what she was doing' - This is their first line of defence when talking about a 14, 15, 16, 17 year old girl. It raises eyebrows straightaway because an adult that has no interest in a child apart from wanting to protect them would automatically think she's been groomed and even if she wanted to go around with all these celebs, then we know it's 100% on the adults to tell the young girl to sling her hook. It's always on the adult. Posters on here make excuses for the adult and attack the victim of abuse. That is a trait of somebody siding with child abuse.
People are siding with Andrew's memory. Again, an automatic defence of a child abuser and sympathy punted straight in their direction. The fact he can apparently remember what he done on a random day in April about 20 years ago when he took his children out but can't remember dancing, being photographed and shagging the young girl in question tells every respectful adult with common sense that he's lying and he's lying to cover his back because of what he done and knew what was going on. He even lied about sweating. Lies, lies and more lies. A trait of a child abuser will be to always target the victim and excuse the attacker.
'She's only in it for the money' - A normal respectful adults first thought is to think that lass deserves every penny she can get from them dirty bastards who abused her and took away her innocence. A trait of a child abuser will be to attack the victim and try to make them responsible while at the same time giving reasons for the attacker to be blameless.
Can you spot a pattern yet, Sucky? I'd swear on my kids lives that there's *****philes use the premier league board after the comments I've seen over the last year or so over these sort of incidents.
Way to much Andrew backing without knowing his side of the story other than the dom cummings style tell em anything what the fk are the underclass gonna do about it......report it to the police we got in our back pockets.
Burn this fking country down and start again.......get that fking old german **** out of that fking repulsive luxury aboard and fking toss her by the fking hair into the Thames.
Anarchy is the only way