in a particular state.
Let's be honest, if you had a 17yo girlfriend and took her on holiday to the States would you check where you were before you banged her
Off Topic Prince Andrew
- Thread starter Libby
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Let's be honest, if you had a 17yo girlfriend and took her on holiday to the States would you check where you were before you banged her
in a particular state.
Let's be honest, if you had a 17yo girlfriend and took her on holiday to the States would you check where you were before you banged her
Not only that, I'd check where my wife was too!
Point taken, whereas 17 does seem a little gross for an old man to be banging, I don't know it should be illegal (and isn't everywhere). obviously the real problem here is really the trafficking.
or is it that she can see a big pay-off due to having a photograph with her and Andy that has Epstein's girlfriend in the background.
I thought the charges were more to do with trafficking, it's just convenient under American law that her age (17) adds extra weight to the charge sheet.
I would accept that I would imagine that a lot of 20 somethings in the UK, wouldn't know that the legal age in America is different, if they went there with their 17 year old girlfriend.
Afterall let's not kid ourselves here, there is probably plenty a member on here that has a 7, 8, 9 or 10 year gap between them and their partner. However, under UK law it is legal. What is not legal is trafficking.
Said this a while back, some dodgy party where girls are being trafficked and a photographer is allowed to take pics and hand copies over to the abused girls?
Doesn't add up really does it. Epstein was definitely guilty but it doesn't mean everyone he ever met was.
Reckon it’s more likely he’s smashed it given his complete lack of co-operation and that mental interview he did with Emily Maitlis. Wrong ‘un, hang him.
Well and guilty or not, Andrew might not be lying when he says he doesn't remember her. She was nothing special (even if he did bang her, he's probably banged hundred of women being a Prince)... I'm sure he doesn't remember every woman who has ever snapped a photo with him.
He's a ****ing pig. Staff on Epstein island seen him with his paws all over a young girl. He knew exactly what was going on with these girls. How can you watch that interview where he was going on about having his kids at a fast food restaurant and having a condition that meant he doesn't sweat and think he's anything other than a sleaze bag who has been caught out good and proper?
If she wins her case and gets a big settlement, she'll look a lot more attractive to me.
Last edited:
For an approaching 40 year old woman she's not terrible. Especially since she doesn't have to keep herself in "exclusive escort condition" anymore.
Anyway, still too much sympathy and excuses being made for Big Andy on here.
And his sympathisersBurn the fackin sweaty ****
'She knew what she was doing' - This is their first line of defence when talking about a 14, 15, 16, 17 year old girl. It raises eyebrows straightaway because an adult that has no interest in a child apart from wanting to protect them would automatically think she's been groomed and even if she wanted to go around with all these celebs, then we know it's 100% on the adults to tell the young girl to sling her hook. It's always on the adult. Posters on here make excuses for the adult and attack the victim of abuse. That is a trait of somebody siding with child abuse.
People are siding with Andrew's memory. Again, an automatic defence of a child abuser and sympathy punted straight in their direction. The fact he can apparently remember what he done on a random day in April about 20 years ago when he took his children out but can't remember dancing, being photographed and shagging the young girl in question tells every respectful adult with common sense that he's lying and he's lying to cover his back because of what he done and knew what was going on. He even lied about sweating. Lies, lies and more lies. A trait of a child abuser will be to always target the victim and excuse the attacker.
'She's only in it for the money' - A normal respectful adults first thought is to think that lass deserves every penny she can get from them dirty bastards who abused her and took away her innocence. A trait of a child abuser will be to attack the victim and try to make them responsible while at the same time giving reasons for the attacker to be blameless.
Can you spot a pattern yet, Sucky? I'd swear on my kids lives that there's *****philes use the premier league board after the comments I've seen over the last year or so over these sort of incidents.