If Warnock had not of been kept on, I think nearly all, including the horses for courses people, would have said it was a travesty. The owner and board kept faith with the staff that got us here. That seems reasonable.
The owner may, however, have felt that he did it on the cheap once, so he can do it again. The previous experience played a part in that as well. I think Warnock's continuous reference to not getting that striker we need shows that he probably wanted more than he was given,
The pathetic form of Hoilett has really hurt us. I think we thought he would be able to hold his own. Looks like we were wrong. Zahore, well, I feel a bit sorry for him.l I truly don't understand why he hasn't been given a lot more time (prior to injury) to try to get up to speed. If he had 8 or 9 full games under his belt by now, he may be looking better. What did we have to lose up front anyway?
Right now, we are still in it somehow. Really, we should have more points even with our cheap squad. Each week we look better in the middle third. The defense is adjusting, but we more up front.
Can’t quibble with your sentiment in the opening paragraph but hindsight whilst being such a wonderful asset shouldn’t have been necessary to see the potential problems given NW has failed in the past to succeed at the next level and the areas of the team he didn’t strengthen ie defence and attack.
Is it fair to summarise the whole problem as emanating from the failure to sign players to enhance the existing team rather than trying to get largely last season’s team to adapt to PL level as the season progresses?