Like on GB news you mean? 1 lefty vs 1 righty?How is that tying itself in knots?
Discussions and Debates should be represented as close to 50/50 otherwise there would be nothing to discuss
Like on GB news you mean? 1 lefty vs 1 righty?How is that tying itself in knots?
Discussions and Debates should be represented as close to 50/50 otherwise there would be nothing to discuss
Read the Labour online platform's many channels! Most of the Labour party are right wing! Wes Streeting is on Tories right wing!Life's all about perspective. To the average Daily Mail reader, almost everything is "from the left".
By referring to Derry as Londonderry, the BBC is showing a unionist bias, when it should be fair to both communities. It is a while since I have heard BBC bulletins, so I am prepared for correction if it is referred to as Derry in subsequent references to the City.We’ll, NI is part of the UK and it’s official name is Londonderry. If it becomes a part of a unified Ireland then I’m sure it will be known as Derry. Until then the BBC is clearly obliged to stick to its current official name
Rupert Lowe = Attention Seeking Prick!Rupert Lowe's latest **** move is to call for a referendum on the death penalty.
It's charter for renewal is up for renewal next year, so the question should be, "do we need a "state" broadcasting service or should it be independent ánd left to find its own funding. So long as the Archers finds a broadcaster somewhere, we shall all be happy.The comments that "because both sides of the political spectrum accuse the BBC of bias it points to a balance", don't really hold much water.
The fact that those defending the BBC are overwhelmingly from the left gives a truer reflection of how things are.
It's charter for renewal is up for renewal next year, so the question should be, "do we need a "state" broadcasting service or should it be independent ánd left to find its own funding. So long as the Archers finds a broadcaster somewhere, we shall all be happy.
The whole BBC debate on this thread seems to have ignored radio output. Personally, my wife and I use Radio one and Radio six everyday, and Radio three frequently. The standards on all three stations are often very high. Radio four's current affars and news output seems to me to be balanced and insightful. Radio 6 is often exceptional and varied. Our Sundays are often brightened by the standard of music played by talented and knowledgeable presenters. It encourages us to watch Sunday sport with the sound turn off.. Radio 3's late night output is often a kaleidoscope of interesting new sounds, and of course if you love choral music, it is worth exploring. These are my staples, though the BBC radio output is much more varied, i.e. something for eveyone. The point being you can choose and take from whatever you prefer. Maybe BCC radio is more varied, I hesitate to us the word diverse, worth a large proportion of licence fee..
The whole BBC debate on this thread seems to have ignored radio output. Personally, my wife and I use Radio one and Radio six everyday, and Radio three frequently. The standards on all three stations are often very high. Radio four's current affars and news output seems to me to be balanced and insightful. Radio 6 is often exceptional and varied. Our Sundays are often brightened by the standard of music played by talented and knowledgeable presenters. It encourages us to watch Sunday sport with the sound turn off.. Radio 3's late night output is often a kaleidoscope of interesting new sounds, and of course if you love choral music, it is worth exploring. These are my staples, though the BBC radio output is much more varied, i.e. something for eveyone. The point being you can choose and take from whatever you prefer. Maybe BCC radio is more varied, I hesitate to us the word diverse, worth a large proportion of licence fee..
I always have Radio 3 on in the car. Partly because they have less irritating DJs than most other stations. Can't stand opera though, so i switch to R2 if they're playing that
I know. I can’t help but laugh at thisThis is a prime example of the BBC attempting to be impartial and people are criticizing them for it, whilst simultaneously complaining that they aren't impartial enough.
Shows the scale of their challenge.
By referring to Derry as Londonderry, the BBC is showing a unionist bias, when it should be fair to both communities. It is a while since I have heard BBC bulletins, so I am prepared for correction if it is referred to as Derry in subsequent references to the City.
Or GB News(not), Telegraph, Mail, Express, spiked et al.I know. I can’t help but laugh at this
People need to see this for what it is and it’s not for the benefit of the general population
BBCs job is made so much more difficult in a world of polarised opinions, but let’s attack the organisation that tries to do better, rather than those who don’t even try eh?
It’s far easier to be Trump and just spout bollocks without redress
They’ll have to up their game in Cornwall thenBy referring to Derry as Londonderry, the BBC is showing a unionist bias, when it should be fair to both communities. It is a while since I have heard BBC bulletins, so I am prepared for correction if it is referred to as Derry in subsequent references to the City.
Indeed, I just thought I’d give an example and picked the one that would be seen by some as the most credibleOr GB New (not), Telegraph, Mail, Express, spiked et al.
The whole BBC debate on this thread seems to have ignored radio output. Personally, my wife and I use Radio one and Radio six everyday, and Radio three frequently. The standards on all three stations are often very high. Radio four's current affars and news output seems to me to be balanced and insightful. Radio 6 is often exceptional and varied. Our Sundays are often brightened by the standard of music played by talented and knowledgeable presenters. It encourages us to watch Sunday sport with the sound turn off.. Radio 3's late night output is often a kaleidoscope of interesting new sounds, and of course if you love choral music, it is worth exploring. These are my staples, though the BBC radio output is much more varied, i.e. something for eveyone. The point being you can choose and take from whatever you prefer. Maybe BCC radio is more varied, I hesitate to us the word diverse, worth a large proportion of licence fee..
I said I stand corrected!!We've literally just told you what the policy at the BBC is!
Taking of Radio 3, there was a Friday evening music program called, if I recall, World Music. I loved it!!Tigger
This is an interesting post. My new car does not have a cd player so i am forced to listen to the radio.
I love jazz but Jazz FM.is attrocious even without the adverts. This usually leaves me with Radio Solent which i listen to for rhe sport or Radio 3 and 4. I think Radio 4 is more balanced than the BBC website or television news and i like tge heakthy dose of eceptocism of Nick Robinson. Evan Davis is extremely fair and balanced.
Radio 3 is interesting because you can sense it is being dumbed down to match Classic FM. It is probably the only national station that regularly plays jazz but it does have a popularist agenda these days so you get stuff like Johan Strauss , adagio from Mahler 5 , Beethoven played alot , especially in the morning and some of the quality of presenation has declined. Wish they would stop playing Brahms ! Katy Derham is like a female Alan Partidge. Cannot stand Petroc Trelwany. Radio has to go off when he is on.
There used to be a separate licence for radio back in the day for people who only used the radio.The whole BBC debate on this thread seems to have ignored radio output. Personally, my wife and I use Radio one and Radio six everyday, and Radio three frequently. The standards on all three stations are often very high. Radio four's current affars and news output seems to me to be balanced and insightful. Radio 6 is often exceptional and varied. Our Sundays are often brightened by the standard of music played by talented and knowledgeable presenters. It encourages us to watch Sunday sport with the sound turn off.. Radio 3's late night output is often a kaleidoscope of interesting new sounds, and of course if you love choral music, it is worth exploring. These are my staples, though the BBC radio output is much more varied, i.e. something for eveyone. The point being you can choose and take from whatever you prefer. Maybe BCC radio is more varied, I hesitate to us the word diverse, worth a large proportion of licence fee..