I would be intrigued who is going to sit in thr Reform cabinet. They have no one with experience. I am imagining a cabinet of Dolly the Sheep type clones of Farage
Keep imagining Ian, because a Reform Government will never happen. Reform might get two seats in Hampshire - Portsmouth North and Southampton Bitterne. In fact I will say they will get zero seats in Hampshire.I would be intrigued who is going to sit in thr Reform cabinet. They have no one with experience. I am imagining a cabinet of Dolly the Sheep type clones of Farage
Those voices of the left (not all of them by any means) seem to want to have a Britain of self segregated enclaves that are invite only rather than be additions to the existing culture for everyone to share and enjoy.
My belief is almost everyone on both sides wants manageable immigration, as close to a net of zero as possible. But, the issue is the left - of which I am a part - will always fight the deliberate attempts to alienate foreign people and villanise them. So, people posting misleading charts and articles get angry when ‘leftists’ point out what is wrong with that information. I also think the left would never be okay with mass deportations or anything like that. They have been allowed in and we need to make them welcome (or they won’t have any reason to integrate). That doesn’t mean we believe immigration is at an acceptable level. But blaming the immigrant is pure nonsense.
The other iniquitous aspect of FTPT is the wasted votes. If a candidate wins 75,000 votes in a turnout of 80,000, most of the votes for that candidate are wasted. It would be far better if the “excess” votes went towards a national poll for additional seats for the party.These are polls that don't just easy x % = n seats. They actually try to work out properly a representation of how that percentage could equate to seats. Thats why the FPTP is so different to the PR one. In theory in a 2 party system 1 party could win all the seats with only 650 votes more than the other but each seat winning by one vote!
Again, he was not singled out in anyway, he didn’t heed the warnings of his insults and got banned (as others did) but he kept going when allowed back.
To him, anyone who didn’t agree with him was stupid and had a low IQ, and he could out bench press anyone.
And then the nonsense of saying London had fallen all the time.
Posters on here stopped engaging with him, I find it strange for you to think he was innocent, very strange.
Can I ask when the last time you heard the words ‘kind’, ‘inclusive’ or ‘tolerant’ from anybody on this board? The constant strawmanning you drop yourself down to is a little desperate.If that were true he would have been banned for personal insults which I wouldn't defend. But he wasn't, it was for "lowering the level of debate". However popular that move was with his oppos, it was a stitch up. His comments about bench pressing, London falling or for that matter low testosterone (my favourite) were a bit eccentric but so what? Hardly a crime. Insulting only to the very thinned skinned or someone pretending to be offended. They certainly weren't breaking the rules or merited a ban.
Posters didn't stop engaging with him, they took him on and couldn't cope when he refused to roll over. Let's face it, hardly anyone from whatever side of the argument concedes anything and hardly anyone wants to debate. It's gone way past that point and I include myself in that and have good reasons for it. I've answered you only because you seem reasonable without making hysterical accusations, unlike some who I generally ignore.
Os has a confrontational style and it rubbed some people up the wrong way. I'm not saying he is innocent of that but he was not tolerated like some others because of his right wing opinions. What I am saying is he was removed because it suited those who oppose his views and it was a dirty trick.
I made my views known at the time and I've repeated them only because Jasper asked why he was banned. I don't expect to persuade anyone to think it was wrong but people who like to spout about being kind, inclusive and tolerant need to be reminded from time to time, of their hypocrisy.
If that were true he would have been banned for personal insults which I wouldn't defend. But he wasn't, it was for "lowering the level of debate". However popular that move was with his oppos, it was a stitch up. His comments about bench pressing, London falling or for that matter low testosterone (my favourite) were a bit eccentric but so what? Hardly a crime. Insulting only to the very thinned skinned or someone pretending to be offended. They certainly weren't breaking the rules or merited a ban.
Posters didn't stop engaging with him, they took him on and couldn't cope when he refused to roll over. Let's face it, hardly anyone from whatever side of the argument concedes anything and hardly anyone wants to debate. It's gone way past that point and I include myself in that and have good reasons for it. I've answered you only because you seem reasonable without making hysterical accusations, unlike some who I generally ignore.
Os has a confrontational style and it rubbed some people up the wrong way. I'm not saying he is innocent of that but he was not tolerated like some others because of his right wing opinions. What I am saying is he was removed because it suited those who oppose his views and it was a dirty trick.
I made my views known at the time and I've repeated them only because Jasper asked why he was banned. I don't expect to persuade anyone to think it was wrong but people who like to spout about being kind, inclusive and tolerant need to be reminded from time to time, of their hypocrisy.
As I see it, he broke the rules and paid the ultimate price.
Has Chilcs killed him, then ?
That seems a bit harsh!
Has Chilcs killed him, then ?
That seems a bit harsh!
I wouldn't give Trump the steam off my piss even if he was dying of dehydration.Just been listening to Noga Tarnapolsky talking to James O’Brien from Jerusalem, and the relief and joy mixed with caution in her voice was palpable. The ceasefire has already started, and the next stage will be the release of all the Israeli hostages, including the bodies of those who have died in Hamas captivity.
One of the most interesting parts of her analysis was when she was explaining about the strange relationship Netanyahu has with the Qatari state. It was Netanyahu who persuaded Qatar to funnel billions of dollars to Hamas, in order to undermine the legitimate Palestine Authority and take control of Gaza.
Let’s all send our hopes and prayers to that part of the world that this ceasefire builds into a permanent peace.
And yes, give Trump a million Nobel Prizes for his part in bringing it about.
I would be intrigued who is going to sit in thr Reform cabinet. They have no one with experience. I am imagining a cabinet of Dolly the Sheep type clones of Farage
Voices of the left? I don't hear any of them saying that. I am aware that there are some isolated regions in England where second and third generation immigrant communities live segregated lives, but I'm not aware of any voices of the left saying this is a good thing. Unless you mean George Galloway, who is a colossal unprincipled dickhead...
The other iniquitous aspect of FTPT is the wasted votes. If a candidate wins 75,000 votes in a turnout of 80,000, most of the votes for that candidate are wasted. It would be far better if the “excess” votes went towards a national poll for additional seats for the party.
No idea how that would work, but anything is better than FPTP.
I mean more the talking heads and commentariat that are very vocal and push narratives of cultural appropriation or celebrate difference fro an angle of complete difference and staying completely different!
For example my missus is quite obviously black, she is quite obviously foreign too but she does not only associate with fellow Portuguese nor only black people! Yes she listens mostly to Portuguese music but thats because she likes Portuguese music mostly (but not limited to )in her first language.
She enjoys a mostly British life as a Portuguese woman in Britain. Its a big difference to enjoying a Portuguese life as a Portuguese woman in Britain! She shares her culture with others and enjoys being able to share the British Culture with the Brits (and the Poles and everyone else) as well.
She does not isolate herself from other cultures within Britain and refuse to let anyone (Brit or otherwise) join in her own culture. She is proud of her Portuguese culture like I am proud of British culture and we both enjoy sharing our own cultures with others. Be that foods, music, TV (although best in British language or with subtitles. lol) sports. All sorts. She used to love the British pub when it was still a thing.
First thing her Mum does when she comes over is get Fish & Chips. lol.
I find these people to be a very small minority magnified mostly by those outraged at the views. Cultural appropriation was a university student outrage topic a decade ago. Are people still bothered? Since all culture is appropriated- from those around us - I always found it a weird concept.The 'commentariat' may well push that, but I don't think anyone here does
I don't hear anyone pushing that message, but I'm not on X or Facebook etc
To me Cultural Appropriation needs to involve actions that are disrespectful, exploitative and lack understanding of the original context, meaning, or significance
I'm sure that many people like sharing their culture with others and others culture with theirs, I know I do
Hence her Mum can enjoy Fish & Chips and I can listen to Fado
Like 'Political Correctness' it can be used and abused as an issue, when it is really all just about respecting other people
Social Media fuels polarisation of views
"Left voices" means the dominant vocal lot that "speak on behalf" of everyone! What the real world thinks only counts on voting day. The rest of the time is those with a platform talking on "our behalf" portraying their own preferences as if they are representative of those without a platform!The 'commentariat' may well push that, but I don't think anyone here does
I don't hear anyone pushing that message, but I'm not on X or Facebook etc
To me Cultural Appropriation needs to involve actions that are disrespectful, exploitative and lack understanding of the original context, meaning, or significance
I'm sure that many people like sharing their culture with others and others culture with theirs, I know I do
Hence her Mum can enjoy Fish & Chips and I can listen to Fado
Like 'Political Correctness' it can be used and abused as an issue, when it is really all just about respecting other people
Social Media fuels polarisation of views