The "fiddle" that is key is that she named one house as her home for cheaper council tax and the other for cheaper stamp duty!But someone gave her advice. If she worked out this fiddle on her own, we should make her PM now.
The putting half the house in her son's trust with her and her husband holding the other 50% shared is not a problem at all IMO and advice on that or not is a non story.
That she then cashed out her 25% by selling that to that trust "for her son's benefit?" is questionable to say the least.
The key thing though is you can only (in real life) have 1 first home and the other is a second home. Its unbelievable that it is legal to be able to register different houses as first home for different purposes. But then these sort of laws have had these dodgy loopholes in them since forever and seemingly never get closed.
I haven't read transcripts or anything but for her law firm to publicly deny they gave her that advice I am assuming she actually named or gave reason to believe the advice was from them. But that is an assumption.
Last edited: