Off Topic Politics Thread

[LincolnSaint]

The actual real sign of losing an argument is never responding to people when asking for sources or further information, or answering their requests with a question as you always do. Or just ignoring them.

So I will ask you one more time in response to you that that London has fallen, show me the areas of London that have fallen and where you cannot go for more than 30 seconds without getting knifed, Phone stolen or watched by a foreign looking man (who is illegal) after your kids.

And to follow up. It was so ****ing dodgy in North London that we were able to sit (quite comfortably) in 2 Tottenham only pubs where the only issue was a barman throwing away my packet of mini cheddars before we had finished. That was Libbys food for the day

 

[StJabbo1]

I hope this is true and not a spoof.

You must log in or register to see images

Spoof or not that's full oranjeboom cheetosis.

 

[San Tejón]

You guys ready for WWIII?

Reports of two Chinese citizens being captured by Ukrainian troops, as they were fighting for Russia.
Not yet known if they are mercenaries or were living in Russia, or if China has provided forces to support Putin.

You must log in or register to see media

 

[Osvaldorama]

I was going to ignore this as I feel like you don’t want to engage properly with anything anybody else says, but I think there are issues with what you have said.

There are 3,500,000 white people between 16-24. I can’t be bothered to find the stat for the extra year so will round down for you.


By these statistics 370,000 white British teenagers do think Tate is someone to look up to. That is a significant number of people potentially being influenced by misogynistic and violent views.

I am not sure, however, the point of separating these attitudes by race. These are all British people.

The point is that the data shows that the actual violent attacks are mostly either Islamic extremists or far right nut jobs. Both of which have the same root cause. Poor immigration policy and a weak two tier justice.

This adolescence fiction from the government ignores all of this whilst blaming all young men… it’s scandalous.
It’s pure gaslighting.

Instead of addressing people’s concerns about Britain becoming more unsafe and how they’re unable to prevent atrocities they are shifting the blame onto young men.

Similar vibes to when Keir Stalin called everyone “far right” for wanting the Southport killer’s background investigated. (Which it turns out they are STILL trying to cover up)

All this government does is lie and gaslight. They are actually creating more harm by doing this.

If you continue to tell young men that they are inherently evil and live in this imaginary evil patriarchy they will gravitate towards figures like Tate even more. I guarantee it.

 

[Libby]

And to follow up. It was so ****ing dodgy in North London that we were able to sit (quite comfortably) in 2 Tottenham only pubs where the only issue was a barman throwing away my packet of mini cheddars before we had finished. That was Libbys food for the day

Mate those were a ****ing godsend as I was ****ing starving on the way home.

Who'd have thought the biggest risk to me in fallen London was failing to get some **** grub eh

 

[thereisonlyoneno7]

The point is that the data shows that the actual violent attacks are mostly either Islamic extremists or far right nut jobs. Both of which have the same root cause. Poor immigration policy and a weak two tier justice.

What have far right nut jobs got to do with poor immigration? Oh you mean letting in brown people to this white and aryan land we live in promotes far right to fight against it?

Instead of addressing people’s concerns about Britain becoming more unsafe and how they’re unable to prevent atrocities they are shifting the blame onto young men.

It isn't unsafe. We've been through this 100 times and you ignore it. It is safer now than before. Where is this 'fallen London'?

If you continue to tell young men that they are inherently evil and live in this imaginary evil patriarchy they will gravitate towards figures like Tate even more. I guarantee it.

Is this the same where we continue to tell you your posts are racist, you become more racist?

 

[Osvaldorama]

He also decided to give a racial breakdown of young people’s attitudes to Tate for no reason at all.

It’s not for no reason at all though, is it?

If they want to treat adolescence like a documentary and build government policy around it, why didn’t they base the character off the actual data?

They want to paint young males as evil. With a more specific agenda against young white males.

Even though the data of who is watching this misogynistic content goes completely against this.

 

[......loading......]

It’s not for no reason at all though, is it?

If they want to treat adolescence like a documentary and build government policy around it, why didn’t they base the character off the actual data?

They want to paint young males as evil. With a more specific agenda against young white males.

Even though the data of who is watching this misogynistic content goes completely against this.

What’s your maths like? Because 15% of white people 16-25 is far more people than the other slices of population you mentioned.

This is a white country when it suits you but lets do percentages when it doesn’t

 

[......loading......]

The point is that the data shows that the actual violent attacks are mostly either Islamic extremists or far right nut jobs. Both of which have the same root cause. Poor immigration policy and a weak two tier justice.

This adolescence fiction from the government ignores all of this whilst blaming all young men… it’s scandalous.
It’s pure gaslighting.

Instead of addressing people’s concerns about Britain becoming more unsafe and how they’re unable to prevent atrocities they are shifting the blame onto young men.

Similar vibes to when Keir Stalin called everyone “far right” for wanting the Southport killer’s background investigated. (Which it turns out they are STILL trying to cover up)

All this government does is lie and gaslight. They are actually creating more harm by doing this.

If you continue to tell young men that they are inherently evil and live in this imaginary evil patriarchy they will gravitate towards figures like Tate even more. I guarantee it.

This is probably the most WOKE response I ever read. You are saying that a drama about one white boy in a majority white country tells us that all white teenagers are bad? I think you need get out of the identity politics obsession, bro. It is a TV drama about one teenager - who happens to be white - in a country that is mainly white.

Are you trying to say only black people can be shown to use knives? Is this the most racist thing you have said? Sadly… no.

 

[Osvaldorama]

This is probably the most WOKE response I ever read. You are saying that a drama about one white boy in a majority white country tells us that all white teenagers are bad? I think you need get out of the identity politics obsession, bro. It is a TV drama about one teenager - who happens to be white - in a country that is mainly white.

Are you trying to say only black people can be shown to use knives? Is this the most racist thing you have said? Sadly… no.

You are the woke one, unfortunately.

You see - you asked the question of why creating legislation around a fiction is an awful idea.

I answer you, with facts and data. And as usual you resort to insults and calling me racist.

Still assuming that I’m white as well. Does make me laugh

 

[......loading......]

You are the woke one, unfortunately.

You see - you asked the question of why creating legislation around a fiction is an awful idea.

I answer you, with facts and data. And as usual you resort to insults and calling me racist.

Still assuming that I’m white as well. Does make me laugh

I responded with data. There are more white people that watch Tate than black in the UK. But you use percentages to avoid this fact.

And you are white.

 

[saintrichie123]

You must log in or register to see images

 

[Osvaldorama]

I responded with data. There are more white people that watch Tate than black in the UK. But you use percentages to avoid this fact.

And you are white.

Don’t assume my race, gender or pronouns please. That’s extremely rude.

 

[tomw24]

Don’t assume my race, gender or pronouns please. That’s extremely rude.

You don't really have the right to lecture people on making assumptions TBH.

 

[......loading......]

Don’t assume my race, gender or pronouns please. That’s extremely rude.

White insecure male alert

 

[StJabbo1]

White insecure male alert

With tostesteronicis.

 

[Osvaldorama]

White insecure male alert

I’m none of those things. Lol.

 

[StJabbo1]

I’m none of those things. Lol.

He said sincerely folks.

 

[......loading......]

He said sincerely folks.

He just identifies as an insecure white guy

 

[Osvaldorama]

I responded with data. There are more white people that watch Tate than black in the UK. But you use percentages to avoid this fact.

And you are white.

This makes a lot of sense now to be honest.

The fact you fail to comprehend even simple data like this. It’s cleared a lot of things up for me. Thank you.