And Laurence Fox. Abominable people on an abominable channel. I thought there was a pause on transmission that could have cut the unsavoury comments.Dan Wootton suspended from GB News. Well, there’s a thing…
And Laurence Fox. Abominable people on an abominable channel. I thought there was a pause on transmission that could have cut the unsavoury comments.Dan Wootton suspended from GB News. Well, there’s a thing…
And Laurence Fox. Abominable people on an abominable channel. I thought there was a pause on transmission that could have cut the unsavoury comments.
The option to carry firearms is voluntary. If an officer isn't in the right head space to carry then he/she has every right not to draw weapons prior to the start of their shift. I appreciate that the politics thread is generally a left leaning space but **** me, defund the police? This is another nonsense carry over from the good old US of A where their police departments are buying up surplus military stock. If the police in England are Wales were any further defunded there'd be none left.
AFO's are not paid more than there unarmed counterparts. It is a voluntary role which is subject to more scrutiny then anywhere else in the world.
If there was an aspect of your job which was entirely voluntary, didn't pay any more money and if you do it (even correctly) you could end up in front of jury of 12 people who may or may not hate your guts because of the uniform you wear, and could spend the rest of your life in prison for a split second decision you made years before, would you volunteer? Honestly?
Yes, I'm sure the knives were out for him possibly Fox to. Creeps both,Yeah, but the Wootton thing is an Al Capone style suspension. Get him over a smaller misdeed before the major **** starts hitting the fan (there's another Byline piece on him coming out today, in a coincidence that is a surprise to nobody).
Yes, I'm sure the knives were out for him possibly Fox to. Creeps both,
Funding and transparent accountability.I do think 'fund the police' would be a far better step than defunding them (further).
It is a bit of hoot couple of media slappers, darling of rightwing culture warriors, gobbing off at each other whist GB news laughably go moral.Fox is now going after Wootton, which is utterly hilarious too.
I do think 'fund the police' would be a far better step than defunding them (further).
One of the truly brilliant aspects of Policing in E&W is the Special Constable scheme. If one genuinely (as opposed to what they're fed by social media) believes the Police are one big racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, oppressive and violent organisation*. Join. See for oneself. A couple of shifts a month. Think of the expose which could be run after and/or the potential for showing how it should be done. Or.......more likely they will see how chronically underfunded Policing actually is and what 99% of police time is taken up with. But that's too much like hard work. Much easier to pontificate behind the safety of a screen on a job they have absolutely no idea about at all. Not aimed at you LTL!
* Doesn't it strike anyone as odd that the police are both "woke" (dancing at pride, ignoring grooming gangs and virtue signalling to morons on the right) and at the same time racist, homophobic, sexist scum to morons on the left. It's almost like neither are true.
Funding and transparent accountability.
I am so pleased that we have the nice impartial GB TV it is so much better than the bigoted and biased BBC. I watch it all the time especially my three favourite hosts, Nadine, Reece- Mogg and Nigel Farage. There is even the occasional treat on occasions when Rupert Lowe is mentioned.
Haha, no, I know. A very good mate of mine is high up in West Mercia police now. The actions of a few aren't the overall, I'm extremely aware of that. Despite my recent somewhat disappointing encounters with policing (specifically the Met), I do recognise that much of it is because they're woefully underfunded and under resourced. I've known a lot of police in my life, and pretty much all of them (bar one) are good people.
If there is one item of news that I feel needs to be addressed on this thread and that has been seriously over-looked it is the murder charge levied against the office who killed Chris Kaba. I have been following the case off and on as the incident is so shocking but this has been exacerbated by the fact that fellow firearms officers have now threatened to down tools in disgust that their collegue is facing such a serious charge. The media coverage (including the BBC) has generally been extremely poor and very biased towards the officer concerned and the police in general. A lot of the coverage has centred on the threatened mass decision for fire arms officers to down tools.
I am really shocked by this news story. Firstly, we know from past experience that the Metropolitan police force is instituationally racist. This is not a subjective views but a genuine fact. In addition, we also know from the recent case of Sarah Everard that our police forces contain a significant proportion of " rotten apples" who are quite prepared to murder the people they are employed to serve and protect. The circumstances of Chris Kaba's needs to be examined as well as he was an innocent man pursued by a team of police officer which culminated in Kaba's car being blocked in and before he was immediately shot in the head a point blank range. I am relieved that the officer has been charged with murder and, on the basis of the facts that have been made public, this feels very much like an execution carried out in public on an innocent man. I would suspect that this is likely to be even more damning that the previous killing of another innocent man, Mark Duggan. The full details will , no doubt , come out in the trial.
I feel that there are two concerning elements in this story. The first is that Chris Kaba's family needs to see justice properly served. The second element is perhaps even more serious insofar that it is clear that the armed police officers are supporting their colleague and now feel that it is acceptable to argue that the risks they undoubtedly encounter obviate the need for them to be subject to the law of the land when they behave in a seemingly criminal fashion. There seems to be no sympathy towards Mr Kaba's family nor any consideration that the police officer was very much in the wrong amd no better than a criminal himself. the media is not being at all balanced. Why is the BBC not questioning this ? Why are our newspapers siding with officers amd not sunbjecting them to scrutiny. I feel that this is an utter disgrace. The media effectively implying that it is ok for officers to kill innocent civilians regardless of the circumstances and not suffer the consequences if they either get things wrong or perpetrate a crime themselves. For me, this is chilling. It is even more frightening that untrained soldiers have been offered to cover for the resultant short fall of fire arm officers. Given the British Army's propensiy for alleged war crimes in Afghanistan and Iraq, it does not take a genius to realise that this will endanger the lives of more civilians in the UK.
In summary, I feel that the officer charged with murder should not be supported by his colleagues, at least in public, until the facts are known. Until the trial is over and the facts have been establisbed, they should remain impartial . To do otherwise is to suggest that they find the actions of their colleague to be acceptable. I also feel that this should be a wake up call in the UK. We have police forces in this country who are effectivley operating a shoot to-kill policy against people of colour - this is regardless of whether they are innocent or not. People on this board are quick to condemn the actions of other countries yet the case of Chris Kaba is demonstrative that our own forces are often not fit for purpose and that people of colour can no longer guarantee that these forces will protect and serve them. I am shocked that something like this can happen in the UK and disgusted that the media continually advocates the difficulty of the firearms officers' job whilst ignoring the far more chilling fate of Mr Kaba.
This is the UK's George Floyd moment albeit I feel that it is actually far worse as Chris Kaba was an innocent civilian and the officers did not even confront his - they merely shot him in cold blood. In my opinion we need to look at the behaviour of our police force and not sweep the issue of brutality against coloured people under the carpet. The law needs to be seen to be done and justice meted out. The officer in question should not escape the consequences of the law as must also be the case of those fellow officer who have condoned his action. I think it is time to defund the police and put measures in place which protect people of all races and creeds. We would condemn this behaviour if it happened in a country like Iran. The fact that it has happened in the UK makes us no better.
On 3 - what specifically is a royal commission? Are there other types of commission that have less powers?If I had a magic wand and unlimited budget, I'd take the following steps to try and recover faith in the police.
1) Basic Law lessons at school. Explain fully what the police can/can't do. Explain how police can escalate their use of force to match yours. Explain how even if the police are wrong the place to fight it is court
2) Release BWV of an incident straight away post incident
3) A royal commission on policing. What do the public actually want? If its attending every burglary/shoplifter, great. But Explain that cannot be done whilst attending all and every MH incident. Enshrine in law priorities.
4) Making being a police officer a serious aggrevating condition if any crimes are committed. Double sentences for police officers due to the nature of the role.
5) Invite senior public critics (I'm looking at you MP's and media moguls) and get them to a police training centre. Invite them to restrain an individual who doesn't want to be handcuffed and put in a vehicle. Get them to do it in one's and twos and film it. Remind them after the event that they were restraining someone not trying to take their head off and not off their ****ing face on gear. Film it and every time they decide to flap their gums post it underneath their tweet.
There's loads more but **** it
What is he going after Wooton for ? I assume this is on Twitter ?Fox is now going after Wootton, which is utterly hilarious too.