Privileged Entitled Elite. Name checks out.You must log in or register to see images
It is almost like high tax earners deliberately misunderstand the tax system to feel sorry for themselves.
If you are rich you pay the same tax as the poor man on the first £12500. Namely zero. Zero tax despite all your wealth.
If you are rich you still pay same on the next £38000. You pay 20% the same as the middle earner on that £38000. You still paid nothing on the 12,500.
If you are rich you are paying an extra 20p in the pound for everything you earn over £50,271. You have to be earning a lot to start feeling that. I think you will live.
But then the rich usually have good accountants and find ways to pay less than the poor…
Personal Allowance Up to £12,570 0%
Basic rate £12,571 to £50,270 20%
Higher rate £50,271 to £125,140 40%
**** me, you here all week?Do you read your own posts?Erm, no you don’t. If you are very fortunate, you don’t get any allowance on the first £12.5k
Find ways to pay less than the poor**** me, you here all week?
If you give me your account details, I’ll send over 50p for the meter.
Debate pointlessPrivileged Entitled Elite. Name checks out.
I was also born poor. Grew up in St. Mary’s. Have worked hard all my life in areas with little financial value but huge social value.
Rich people complaining about contributing to society is the real yawn.
Do you read your own posts?
You want sympathy for those you yourself call “very fortunate”?
Privileged Entitled Elite. Name checks out.
I was also born poor. Grew up in St. Mary’s. Have worked hard all my life in areas with little financial value but huge social value.
Rich people complaining about contributing to society is the real yawn.
Debate pointless
Get out while you can
Your Spineless Lapdog
PEE AKA various Billies mostly silly often angry.I don’t think I am the one coming across angry here, PEE…
I don’t think I am the one coming across angry here, PEE…
Tell you what does annoy me, and particularly with reference to my car being nabbed the other night.
The police.
I spend quite a lot of time in Italy, and much as we might laugh at their police leaning on their Alfas, dressed up to the nines having a ***, they are at least there. They're visible. Both the national and local forces.
Here though, you barely see a police presence. They're far, far more interested in squeaking out £100 fines because one of the plethora of cameras has caught someone doing 34 in a 30 zone or something. When I reported my car being stolen, they couldn't have been less interested - "it's probably in a chop shop or on a boat to Albania mate". There are so many cameras around now, and cameras with numberplate recognition (especially in London, where I live), surely they could spend a small amount of time checking where my car was moved to? But no.
I know it's down to manpower etc., but give me the Italian way any time, rather than this awful, grasping, squeeze cash out of the general public stuff we have here. I dropped my wife at Heathrow to go to Korea the other day - five pound charge to drop her at the 'kiss and fly' place. Squeeze, squeeze, squeeze.
Is the vein still throbbing Bilbo?Maybe angry wasn’t the right word, maybe animated.
Im certainly not angry about this. See, I’m not trying to change your view on this, just saying how it feels on this side. You took issue with that, not me…
I still don’t understand if I use private healthcare, that I pay for my entire family, why I have to pay anything toward it. I don’t even use doctors, I pay again, for access to doctors.
The thing I struggle to understand amongst the posts telling us that the NHS cannot work is that a mere 13 years ago it seemed to function reasonably well.
What changed over those years to take it from pretty much OK to a state where people tell me that it can no longer function?
Genuine question.
Vin
The thing I struggle to understand amongst the posts telling us that the NHS cannot work is that a mere 13 years ago it seemed to function reasonably well.
What changed over those years to take it from pretty much OK to a state where people tell me that it can no longer function?
Genuine question.
Vin
The thing I struggle to understand amongst the posts telling us that the NHS cannot work is that a mere 13 years ago it seemed to function reasonably well.
What changed over those years to take it from pretty much OK to a state where people tell me that it can no longer function?
Genuine question.
Vin
See I'd be all for a change (albeit a reduction rather than complete removal)here if the systems were completely separated but unfortunately they're not. Obviously there's the ambulance example that people on private care would still get access to if they needed it but it runs deeper than that.
If people use private health care then they should always use private health care. Too many people are happy to get initial consultations, preassessments etc through their private health care but then when it comes to having the actual surgery (which will cost much more/not always be covered) will have it on NHS where they've jumped the queue - this shouldn't be allowed imo and the entire pathway should be one or the other.
The other thing is that private hospitals who perform surgery should be forced to have critical care facilities on site in the event they are required. It's not right that someone in the private system can end up being sent to take up an NHS bed because the private sector won't pay for these facilities.
I know for a fact that this happens all the time in the Soton/Pompey areas. And while a bill may be sent (but not always, another NHS inefficiency!) it certainly doesn't cover everything such as the time it takes nurses away from other patients. It also doesn't make up for the fact it can lead to surgeries being cancelled for NHS patients who might need critical care.